My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Search
11-06-2017 Council Packet
LinoLakes
>
City Council
>
City Council Meeting Packets
>
1982-2020
>
2017
>
11-06-2017 Council Packet
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
12/11/2017 12:27:44 PM
Creation date
12/7/2017 12:06:14 PM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
City Council
Council Document Type
Council Packet
Meeting Date
11/06/2017
Council Meeting Type
Work Session Regular
Jump to thumbnail
< previous set
next set >
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
310
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
View images
View plain text
8 FUTURE DEVELOPMENT SUBMITTALS <br />It should be noted that the design standards outlined in this document will only be applied to the parcels <br />in Lino Lakes. Developments within the City of Hugo must obtain permit approvals from their respective <br />government and regulatory agencies independent of this CSMP. <br />Future developments will be responsible to submit a proposal to the City first. The submittal will document <br />which parcel (or portion of a parcel) will be developed. The application must document that the land use <br />proposed and proposed impervious area are consistent with this CSMP (Figure 4, Appendix A) and the <br />planned impervious areas as shown in Appendix F. If future developments wish to deviate from the <br />standards outlined in this CSMP, it is the responsibility of the developer to prepare an application <br />documenting the proposed deviation(s) and how that difference will be mitigated. <br />The developer's application must include: <br />• Name of the parcel or portion of the parcel(s) proposing development <br />• Name of the CSMP Region <br />• Existing and proposed topography and narrative of infrastructure proposed to convey stormwater <br />• Document the total area for existing and proposed conditions, broken down by pervious and <br />impervious areas <br />• Document infiltration potential on site based on soil boring data <br />• Name of the regional BMP (if constructed) to which the proposed project is tributary <br />• Proposed method of pre-treatment prior to stormwater discharge entering the regional system <br />• Requested water quality allocations from regional BMP (if constructed) and maximum allocated to <br />proposed development (Appendix F) <br />Developers also must meet current Lino Lakes and RCWD Rules to the extent practicable, including: <br />• Compliance with maximum post -development discharge rate for the 100 -year event to be less <br />than or equal to 0.1 cfs per acre <br />• Maximize volume reduction practices on site and infiltrate where practicable and in accordance <br />with RCWD Rules <br />• Compliance with current RCWD Rule C.6 Water Quality <br />If the development exceeds the CSMP planned impervious area (Appendix F), the applicant must <br />demonstrate how the additional runoff will be treated to meet the applicable RCWD rules and does not <br />cause adverse impact as defined below. <br />• No damage to structures, buildings, and infrastructure as a result of an increase in flooding <br />(increased water surface elevations, velocities or number of days of inundation); <br />• No property damage or increased maintenance costs resulting from an increase in the amount of <br />erosion, bank failure or accelerated sedimentation; <br />• No decrease in water quality resulting from an increase in phosphorus and sediment loads; and <br />• No permanent loss of the use of flood storage volume during the flood peak within the Anoka <br />Chain of Lakes. <br />If developers choose to exceed the impervious limits or request any other deviations to the assumptions <br />laid out herein, they will be required to address any additional stormwater requirements on that parcel at <br />their own expense to ensure all applicable RCWD rules and requirements are met. Any such BMPs will <br />be considered private and be maintained by, and at the expense of, the owner/developer of the parcel. <br />Comprehensive Stormwater Management Plan <br />Northeast Lino Lakes Drainage Improvement Project <br />WSB Project No. 2929-79 <br />Page 24 <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.