My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Search
12-11-2017 Council Packet
LinoLakes
>
City Council
>
City Council Meeting Packets
>
1982-2020
>
2017
>
12-11-2017 Council Packet
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
1/26/2018 10:27:26 AM
Creation date
1/25/2018 2:40:53 PM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
City Council
Council Document Type
Council Packet
Meeting Date
12/11/2017
Council Meeting Type
Regular
Jump to thumbnail
< previous set
next set >
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
292
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
View images
View plain text
LaMotte Watermain Extension Survey Summary <br />A survey of LaMotte Area residents was sent on November 29, 2017 regarding the proposed extension <br />of watermain as a part of the LaMotte Drive & LaMotte Circle Street & Utility Project. The surveys asked <br />residents whether they supported the proposed watermain extension based on an estimated <br />assessment cost of $9,820. Below is a summary of the responses: <br />Total Number of Surveys Sent: 38 <br />Total Number of Responses: 20 <br />Total Number of “Yes” Responses: 4 <br />Total Number of “No” Responses: 16 <br />Below is a list of additional comments received on the survey: <br />“Not in agreement to use City Water with City Wells being contaminated in Lino Lakes. Restrictions on <br />water-lawn. I do not want FLUORIDE in my drinking water as it is a carcinogen, multiple studies have <br />done on the hazards of fluoride. Lino Lakes has had problems with their city wells and I have family that <br />lives in Lino Lakes and they used my well mater during shutdowns. Blaine is another eample of City Well <br />contamination and maintenance. We don’t need city water, and don’t want it. I do not want to pay for <br />something I already have, and happy with it.” <br />“We are completely satisfied with well water supply – do NOT need added expense on top of big <br />property tax increase set for 2018 – current roadway is on continuous speed bump which forces drivers <br />to reduce speed which is safer for children and pedestrians – not for roadway project.” <br />“We don’t want City Water” <br />“Can’t justify adding city water at a cost of $13,000 plus monthly fees.” <br />“I do not support the extension of the watermain within the LaMotte Project Area.” <br />“Do not agree with extending water on LaMotte Drive.” <br />“NO. Feel we are fine without water.” <br />“Do not want it.” <br />“I just received this letter – not a lot of time for people to respond within your deadline.”
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.