My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Search
04-11-2016 Council Packet
LinoLakes
>
City Council
>
City Council Meeting Packets
>
1982-2020
>
2016
>
04-11-2016 Council Packet
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
3/14/2018 11:51:58 AM
Creation date
3/14/2018 11:38:48 AM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
City Council
Council Document Type
Council Packet
Meeting Date
04/11/2016
Council Meeting Type
Regular
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
193
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
View images
View plain text
CITY COUNCIL WORK SESSION March 28, 2016 <br />DRAFT <br /> 1 <br />CITY OF LINO LAKES 1 <br />MINUTES 2 <br /> 3 <br />DATE : March 28, 2016 4 <br />TIME STARTED : 6:00 p.m. 5 <br />TIME ENDED : 6:25 p.m. 6 <br />MEMBERS PRESENT : Councilmember Rafferty, Kusterman, 7 <br /> Maher, Manthey and Mayor Reinert 8 <br />MEMBERS ABSENT : None 9 <br /> 10 <br /> 11 <br />Staff members present: City Administrator Jeff Karlson; Deputy Public Safety Director 12 <br />Police – Kelly McCarthy; City Clerk Julie Bartell 13 <br /> 14 <br />1. ACE Program Update – Jeff Karlson noted the high level of activity for the 15 <br />city’s ACE Program. The council had received a report at the last meeting on the activity 16 <br />level along with three options to meet the increasing demands – limit participation in the 17 <br />program, add an additional part time Community Service Office (CSO) position or add an 18 <br />Office Tech in Administration to handle the work. Mr. Karlson said he has eliminated 19 <br />the Office Tech possibility because a CSO is much costly. He reviewed the cost of the 20 <br />CSO position and noted that, without a change, the Police Department will have to begin 21 <br />limiting participation in the program now (they are already not allowing the option for 22 <br />speeding tickets). 23 <br /> 24 <br />Council Member Maher noted the department’s grant funded traffic safety officer 25 <br />position and asked how long it is in place. Deputy Director McCarthy explained that it is 26 <br />in place for an additional two to three years. Administrator Karlson noted that the 27 <br />position is also tied to production but that has not been a problem. 28 <br /> 29 <br />The council discussed the usual term of an individual in a CSO position, with staff 30 <br />explaining it is commonly about two years; most often individuals in that position move 31 <br />into police officer positions, either here or within other departments. 32 <br /> 33 <br />The idea of automation was brought up at the last meeting and staff explained the option 34 <br />was reviewed but was not found to be feasible; Deputy Director McCarthy explained the 35 <br />department’s evaluation of automating the process. Additionally the volunteers that 36 <br />were working with the program have pretty much stepped away but that’s the nature of 37 <br />using volunteers – they aren’t always going to be there. 38 <br /> 39 <br />Mayor Reinert reiterated his concern that any new position would have to be tied to a 40 <br />certain activity level so it could be lowered if that activity goes down. Deputy Director 41 <br />McCarthy said she’d have to get more data together to tie a position to activity numbers. 42 <br />Council Member Manthey said he’d like to know if the program was originally budgeted 43 <br />based on an accurate number. Administrator Karlson noted that the budget has increased 44
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.