My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Search
05-22-2017 Council Packet
LinoLakes
>
City Council
>
City Council Meeting Packets
>
1982-2020
>
2017
>
05-22-2017 Council Packet
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
3/14/2018 12:49:48 PM
Creation date
3/14/2018 12:11:19 PM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
City Council
Council Document Type
Council Packet
Meeting Date
05/22/2017
Council Meeting Type
Regular
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
77
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
View images
View plain text
CITY COUNCIL SPECIAL WORK SESSION May 1, 2017 <br />DRAFT <br /> 3 <br />- Cost estimate: Phase 1, all three options priced, both low cost options to higher 90 <br />cost (Mayor Reinert remarked that a remodel without a space expansion hasn’t 91 <br />been priced and Mr. Hutson said that is because that option wouldn’t address 92 <br />future space needs). Mayor Reinert suggested that there is an even lower cost 93 <br />option that would basically add an unheated pole barn, although Director 94 <br />Grochala suggested there could be some space/utility services issues. 95 <br /> 96 <br />Mayor Reinert noted his concern about costs and prudence in spending the taxpayer’s 97 <br />funds. He is more supportive of exploring improvements at the Fire Station No. 2 land 98 <br />for community use, such as a park, and improving the current public works facilities to 99 <br />get equipment protected (i.e. unheated pole barn). Council Member Kusterman 100 <br />remarked that perhaps a more detailed, lower level explanation of costs would be helpful 101 <br />in a careful consideration of spending. Mayor Reinert remarked that the city just dug out 102 <br />of a recession and he’d like to keep the city’s budget small. He supports forward and 103 <br />innovate thinking but this requires a lot of thought and there may be more urgent needs 104 <br />right now. 105 <br /> 106 <br />In addition to more information on costs (at a more micro level), 107 <br />a comparison of proposed square footages to current space would be helpful. Council 108 <br />Member Rafferty remarked that city hall is a good example of a decision based on future 109 <br />needs and the rocky road and changes that can occur as the future comes upon you. 110 <br /> 111 <br />Council Member Rafferty noted that one option would move facilities to the south side of 112 <br />the city and he wonders if that is best location for service provision. Director DeGardner 113 <br />suggested that the closer to the core of the city, the better as far as saving trips and driving 114 <br />economy. Mayor Reinert noted that the future could mean population changes however. 115 <br />Mr. Hutson added that with the south site, it is anticipated that the current site facilities 116 <br />would continue to some extent. 117 <br /> 118 <br />The mayor asked Administrator Karlson, if the roof were leaking here at city hall, what 119 <br />procedure and funding is available to address the problem. Mr. Karlson noted the 120 <br />facilities fund that is available for building expenses at city hall; for the work itself, a 121 <br />bidding process would be appropriate. The mayor asked, would that facilities fund be 122 <br />the same source to fund repairs to the public works facilities. Director DeGardner 123 <br />explained that staff makes judgements about how to move on repair situations. Mayor 124 <br />Reinert suggested that repairs should be done as needed along the way and he feels the 125 <br />funds were available for repairs. 126 <br /> 127 <br />The council concurred that they will receive additional information as they have 128 <br />requested. Council Member Manthey asked about the move of city hall from the old 129 <br />building to the current. Director Grochala noted a study that involved creating a town 130 <br />center as well as the space needs that developed. 131 <br /> 132 <br />Council Member Rafferty requested that the Hugo, Shoreview, etc. public works 133 <br />locations be shared with the council. 134
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.