My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Search
06-26-2017 Council Packet
LinoLakes
>
City Council
>
City Council Meeting Packets
>
1982-2020
>
2017
>
06-26-2017 Council Packet
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
3/14/2018 12:50:49 PM
Creation date
3/14/2018 12:11:42 PM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
City Council
Council Document Type
Council Packet
Meeting Date
06/26/2017
Council Meeting Type
Regular
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
68
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
View images
View plain text
COUNCIL MINUTES June 12, 2017 <br />DRAFT <br />4 <br />He introduced bond counsel from Kennedy and Graven available to answer questions. 136 <br /> 137 <br />Mayor Reinert opened the public hearing. 138 <br /> 139 <br />Charles Puskas, 6994 West Shadow Lake Drive, noted that he has read the feasibility study. He 140 <br />noted language in that study that suggests sewer connection could be considered. Community 141 <br />Development Director Grochala remarked that the city has explored the possibility of extending sewer 142 <br />services, there is a trunk main in place on the north end of the project, and he would suggest it would 143 <br />be a wise decision, however, consideration tonight is only for a street and storm water project. Going 144 <br />forward, there will be a review of other improvements and evaluation of sewer and water extension. 145 <br /> 146 <br />Mayor Reinert recalled past street improvement discussions with neighborhoods where the residents 147 <br />were found to be happy with their well water. It’s been more successful to split the type of projects 148 <br />and let people decide on the improvements that best fit their situation. West Shadow Lake Drive has 149 <br />been the subject of discussion for many years and the roadway is in very poor shape and he feels it is 150 <br />irresponsible for the city to not fix the roadway. Having the roadway dug up could create a great 151 <br />opportunity for residents on the street to get their sewer and water improvements done; that is a 152 <br />decision that will be considered by the residents. 153 <br /> 154 <br />There being no one else wishing to speak, the public hearing was closed at 7:07 p.m. 155 <br /> 156 <br />Community Development Director Grochala explained the process going forward, if a valid petition 157 <br />is not received, including further development of a project study and development of plans and 158 <br />specifications. This would be a design engineering process but also ongoing discussion process with 159 <br />the neighborhood and impacted property such as the golf course. The first actions that residents will 160 <br />see will be surveyors collecting data, well and septic locating, and establishment of neighborhood 161 <br />meetings to keep people up to date in late August or early September. 162 <br /> 163 <br />Staff discussed with Council Member Rafferty the process foreseen on consideration of sewer 164 <br />improvements – there will be additional data gathered and presented to the residents and decisions 165 <br />made at that level. The neighborhood will have much opportunity for input to the process. 166 <br /> 167 <br />Council Member Rafferty moved to approve Resolution No. 17-54 as presented. Council Member 168 <br />Manthey seconded the motion. Motion carried on a voice vote. 169 <br /> 170 <br />6B) Lino Lakes Elementary School Renovation 171 <br /> i. Consider Resolution No. 16-151, Approving Site Improvement Performance 172 <br />Agreement 173 <br /> ii. Consider Resolution No. 17-53, Approving Maintenance Agreement for 174 <br />Stormwater Management Facilities 175 <br /> 176 <br />City Planner Larsen recalled previous council approval of renovation plans for Lino Lakes 177 <br />Elementary and she described the type of improvements planned. It is a city standard that a project 178 <br />of this type include the agreements being presented to the council. She noted that the existing 179 <br />crosswalk will be removed based on a decision by the school district and county that is safety based. 180
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.