My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Search
07-24-2017 Council Packet
LinoLakes
>
City Council
>
City Council Meeting Packets
>
1982-2020
>
2017
>
07-24-2017 Council Packet
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
3/14/2018 1:04:06 PM
Creation date
3/14/2018 12:13:43 PM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
City Council
Council Document Type
Council Packet
Meeting Date
07/24/2017
Council Meeting Type
Regular
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
107
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
View images
View plain text
CITY COUNCIL WORK SESSION July 5, 2017 <br />DRAFT <br /> 6 <br />alternative options to get information from contractors or architects who specialist in 223 <br />remodeling. 224 <br />4.5) New Facility Rental Charges Impacting Recreation Department – Rick 225 <br />DeGardner and Brian Hronski were present. Director DeGardner reviewed his written 226 <br />report outlining charges for facility use that have been instituted by Centennial School 227 <br />District (CSD). He reviewed the fall 2016 programs offered by the city and how the 228 <br />revenue for those programs will not cover the costs of facility rental and result in a 229 <br />significant deficit situation for the department. He reported that staff has attempted to 230 <br />work this out with CSD but they are firm in their determination to charge the fees. The 231 <br />department has worked hard to move what programs they can to city facilities or other 232 <br />non-charge sites; some programs may have to be discontinued. He identifies two 233 <br />scenarios within the staff report to deal with the situation – either challenge the 234 <br />Recreation Supervisors to come up with solutions, or let certain programs go and hope 235 <br />that the school district picks up on those activities and with that a loss of a recreation staff 236 <br />position. 237 <br /> 238 <br />Mayor Reinert suggested that there’s been a deterioration in the relationship between the 239 <br />city and the school district in areas such as this and he fears it is mostly on their side. He 240 <br />recalled ways that the city has worked with the district to assist. He suggested that there 241 <br />are ways to charges back city costs to the district. He’d like to see if CSD would 242 <br />reconsider. 243 <br /> 244 <br />Council Member Manthey asked if the school board members are aware and supportive 245 <br />of this action. Mayor Reinert said he would write a letter to the superintendent and copy 246 <br />the school board members; he’d rather unwind this before having to look at charging 247 <br />back. 248 <br /> 249 <br />Director DeGardner remarked that the youth sports organizations have been given a 250 <br />higher priority and as a result an exemption from the use fees. This would be a big 251 <br />impact to the department and he can state that they have tried to work this out with his 252 <br />contemporaries but that hasn’t worked. He is really faced with a “what do we do for this 253 <br />fall” and he is recommending the direction to staff to work on solutions. 254 <br /> 255 <br />Mayor Reinert asked that staff help him with a letter to the Superintendent, copied to the 256 <br />school board members and perhaps a visit to the next school board meeting. 257 <br /> 258 <br />Council Member Kusterman said he is frustrated especially because he would like to see 259 <br />more budgetary consideration to providing even more recreation opportunities. He 260 <br />agrees with going to the school hierarchy to attempt to work this out. 261 <br /> 262 <br />The council directed staff to proceed with their recommended option one, including the 263 <br />change to the $10,000 contribution. 264
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.