My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Search
10-09-2017 Council Packet
LinoLakes
>
City Council
>
City Council Meeting Packets
>
1982-2020
>
2017
>
10-09-2017 Council Packet
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
3/14/2018 2:29:44 PM
Creation date
3/14/2018 12:32:10 PM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
City Council
Council Document Type
Council Packet
Meeting Date
10/09/2017
Council Meeting Type
Regular
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
172
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
View images
View plain text
drivers believe that the condition does exist. The use of warning signs should be kept to a <br />minimum as the unnecessary use of warning signs tends to breed disrespect for all signs. In <br />situations where the condition or activity is seasonal or temporary, the warning sign should be <br />removed or covered when the condition or activity does not exist. <br /> <br />Policies for installation of warning signs are discussed below: <br /> <br />Analysis Procedure: <br />Step 1: Requests for Warning Signs Evaluations <br />This request can come from either a resident, the City Council, the Traffic Safety <br />Committee, the school district, or from staff observation of a particular condition. If a <br />request is made from a resident, a signed petition of more than 80% of the households <br />within a 300' radius of the location must accompany the request. <br /> <br />Step 2: Data Collection <br />This step in the procedure should include collecting available data as listed below: <br /> • Average Daily Traffic Volume <br /> • Accident Summary <br /> • Site Visit <br /> • Pedestrian Traffic Volumes (if applicable) <br /> • Traffic Speeds <br /> • Site Topography <br /> <br />Step 3: Sign Installation Evaluation <br />An evaluation of the location should be completed to determine if the installation is <br />justified. This procedure for specific types of warning signs is as follows: <br /> <br />1. Crossing Signs (pedestrian, school, etc.) <br />a. Traffic Volume: If a daily traffic volume of a combined 1000 vehicles per <br />day in both directions, exists on the roadway of the crossing or a peak <br />hour volume of a combined 200 vehicles per hour on the crosswalk <br />approaches exist and, <br />b. Crossing Volume: A crossing volume of more than 30 pedestrians per day <br />or 10 pedestrians per peak hour or, <br />c. An 85th percentile speed on the roadway of more than 35 mph and a peak <br />speed of two observations with more than 45 mph or, <br />d. The safe stopping sight distance on the approach to the obstruction is less <br />than 300 feet. <br /> <br /> <br /> <br /> <br />2. Other Warning Geometric Warning Signs (curves, intersections, animal <br />crossings, playgroung, etc.) <br />Other warning signs should be placed based on engineering studies and as <br />outlined in the MnMUTCD Chapter 2C and MnDOT Traffic Engineering <br />Manual Chapter 6. <br /> <br />If the warning sign request meets the requirements, as outlined above the sign(s) are considered a <br />candidate installation. Based on this analysis and further review by city staff and the Traffic
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.