Laserfiche WebLink
CITY COUNCIL WORK SESSION October 2, 2017 <br />DRAFT <br /> 1 <br />CITY OF LINO LAKES 1 <br />MINUTES 2 <br /> 3 <br />DATE : October 2, 2017 4 <br />TIME STARTED : 6:00 p.m. 5 <br />TIME ENDED : 9:55 p.m. 6 <br />MEMBERS PRESENT : Council Member Rafferty, Kusterman, 7 <br /> Maher, Manthey and Mayor Reinert 8 <br />MEMBERS ABSENT : None 9 <br /> 10 <br />Staff members present: City Administrator Jeff Karlson; Public Safety Director John 11 <br />Swenson; Community Development Director Michael Grochala; Finance Director Sarah 12 <br />Cotton; Public Services Director Rick DeGardner; City Planner Katie Larsen; City 13 <br />Engineer Diane Hankee; City Clerk Julie Bartell. 14 <br /> 15 <br />1. City of Columbus Asphalt Plant Update - Community Development Director 16 <br />Grochala reviewed his written report and specifically information on the site of the 17 <br />proposed development. He displayed an aerial view of the vicinity, pointing out 18 <br />activities and uses in the area of the proposed plant. He explained the timeline for 19 <br />receipt of an application by the City of Columbus. The traffic impacts are mainly to 20 <br />Anoka County roadways and so the county has reviewed the proposal and submitted their 21 <br />requirements. The Columbus City Council and Planning Commission have jointly 22 <br />discussed the project. There was a citizen petition submitted requesting an 23 <br />environmental assessment worksheet. The Minnesota Pollution Control Agency has 24 <br />since determined that no worksheet is required. The site is currently zoned light 25 <br />industrial and a rezoning would be required to heavy rezoning; a zoning text amendment 26 <br />is being considered that would not require a rezoning for the development. The 27 <br />Columbus council will be considering that text amendment in the coming weeks, and 28 <br />vote on it at the earliest on November 8. If the text amendment were to go through, a 29 <br />proposal for the project will follow. Mr. Grochala noted receipt of a plant evaluation 30 <br />submitted by Running Aces Casino and Racetrack prepared by a professional real estate 31 <br />consultant and indicating negative issues relating to the proposed development. Mr. 32 <br />Grochala noted that the City of Columbus obviously has authority over land within its 33 <br />boundaries; the City of Lino Lakes’ purview would mainly lie in the need for screening 34 <br />and traffic issues. A formal letter could be submitted identifying the city’s concerns. 35 <br /> 36 <br />Council Member Kusterman confirmed that no utility connection through the City would 37 <br />be required; Mr. Grochala added that the development is proposed to include a septic 38 <br />system. The council discussed the resident feedback from the City of Columbus. 39 <br /> 40 <br />Mayor Reinert asked if there will be 500 trucks trips created each day and Mr. Grochala 41 <br />reviewed the County traffic analysis that indicates about 300 trips on a high use day. 42 <br />Mayor Reinert noted that it seems that a majority of the traffic would head south (through 43 <br />Lino Lakes) from the plant. 44 <br /> 45