My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Search
10-23-2017 Council Packet
LinoLakes
>
City Council
>
City Council Meeting Packets
>
1982-2020
>
2017
>
10-23-2017 Council Packet
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
3/14/2018 2:35:41 PM
Creation date
3/14/2018 12:32:40 PM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
City Council
Council Document Type
Council Packet
Meeting Date
10/23/2017
Council Meeting Type
Regular
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
96
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
View images
View plain text
CITY COUNCIL WORK SESSION October 2, 2017 <br />DRAFT <br /> 4 <br /> 136 <br />4. Comprehensive Plan, Transportation – Chuck Rickert, WSB & Associates, 137 <br />noted the report included in the packet. The discussion coming forward is based on 138 <br />discussion about issue areas that are included in the report (i.e. automated vehicles, 139 <br />changes in management techniques, flashing arrows on traffic signals). Birch Street was 140 <br />a big topic of discussion and he noted that Anoka County has a process related to that 141 <br />street and improvements in its five year plan. Mr. Rickert also mentioned pedestrian 142 <br />improvements and the northern bypass. Moving forward staff will continue working on 143 <br />developing a forecast model for 2040 (in conjunction with Anoka County). This is an 144 <br />update and is provided to keep the council informed on the Comprehensive Plan process. 145 <br /> 146 <br />5. West Shadow Lake and LaMotte Project Update - City Engineer Hankee 147 <br />explained the experience of the recent open house. Council Member Rafferty was in 148 <br />attendance. 149 <br /> 150 <br />Council Member Rafferty indicated that he engaged with a few residents who had 151 <br />questions. He feels that Community Development Director Grochala and WSB staff did 152 <br />an excellent job in fielding questions and providing information. 153 <br /> 154 <br />6. Watermark Update- City Planner Larsen reviewed her written report. She 155 <br />presented information on the proposed development, including the types of homes 156 <br />proposed and a comparison to the previous proposal. 157 <br /> 158 <br />Mayor Reinert remarked that it was a two year process to get to a Mattamy proposal and 159 <br />now this is a new prospect. 160 <br /> 161 <br />Ms. Larsen remarked that change can be anticipated within any ten year development. 162 <br /> 163 <br />Ms. Larsen continued with information on: Land area comparison, zoning, subdivision 164 <br />ordinance, comprehensive plan compliance, final plat extension (to be considered at the 165 <br />coming council meeting), and the recommendation of staff and the Planning and Zoning 166 <br />Board. 167 <br /> 168 <br />Mayor Reinert discussed with staff the issue of when park and other amenity 169 <br />development was to occur with the past proposal and the current. Ms. Larsen and 170 <br />Community Development Director Grochala concurred that the previous plan may have 171 <br />moved slower than expected on their development of the park, etc.; it’s a situation that is 172 <br />more evident with the current plans and costs coming together. The new developer says 173 <br />they would like to start from the south and work toward the north, including development 174 <br />of the amenities as the project moves forward. 175 <br /> 176 <br />Council Member Manthey remarked that the council is in a situation where they must 177 <br />look fresh at this development proposal without consideration of past promises. He 178 <br />asked the developer representatives to explain their assurances. 179 <br /> 180
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.