My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Search
11-27-2017 Council Packet
LinoLakes
>
City Council
>
City Council Meeting Packets
>
1982-2020
>
2017
>
11-27-2017 Council Packet
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
3/14/2018 3:17:53 PM
Creation date
3/14/2018 2:46:13 PM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
City Council
Council Document Type
Council Packet
Meeting Date
11/27/2017
Council Meeting Type
Regular
Jump to thumbnail
< previous set
next set >
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
202
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
View images
View plain text
<br />3 <br /> <br />c. If the existing LOS outside of the proposed subdivision is D, traffic generated <br />by a proposed subdivision will not degrade the level of service below D. <br /> <br />d. The existing LOS must be D or better for all streets and intersections <br />providing access to the subdivision. If the existing level of service is E or F, <br />the subdivision developer must provide, as part of the proposed project, <br />improvements needed to ensure a level of service D or better. <br /> <br />e. Existing roads and intersections providing access to the subdivision must have <br />the structural capacity to accommodate projected traffic from the proposed <br />subdivision or the developer will pay to correct any structural deficiencies. <br /> <br />f. The traffic generated from a proposed subdivision shall not require City street <br />improvements that are inconsistent with the Lino Lakes Capital Improvement <br />Plan. However, the City may, at its discretion, consider developer-financed <br />improvements to correct any street deficiencies. <br /> <br />g. The LOS requirements in paragraphs a. to d. above do not apply to the I- <br />35W/Lake Drive or I-35E/Main St. interchanges. At City discretion, <br />interchange impacts must be evaluated in conjunction with Anoka County and <br />the Minnesota Dept. of Transportation, and a plan must be prepared to <br />determine improvements needed to resolve deficiencies. This plan must <br />determine traffic generated by the subdivision project, how this traffic <br />contributes to the total traffic, and the time frame of the improvements. The <br />plan also must examine financing options, including project contribution and <br />cost sharing among other jurisdictions and other properties that contribute to <br />traffic at the interchange. <br /> <br />h. The City does not relinquish any rights of local determination. <br /> <br />The church rectory/single family home will utilize the existing west driveway <br />egressing/ingressing onto Elm Street. The church rectory/single family home will not <br />generate any excess traffic or change the level of service. Elm Street has structural <br />capacity to accommodate one new single family home. <br /> <br />5. The proposed development shall be served with adequate and safe water supply. <br /> <br />The site is served by municipal water that can accommodate the demands of a new <br />church rectory/single family home. <br /> <br />6. The proposed development shall be served with an adequate and safe sanitary sewer <br />system. <br /> <br />The site is served by municipal sanitary sewer that can accommodate the demands of <br />a new church rectory/single family home. <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.