My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Search
11-27-2017 Council Packet
LinoLakes
>
City Council
>
City Council Meeting Packets
>
1982-2020
>
2017
>
11-27-2017 Council Packet
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
3/14/2018 3:17:53 PM
Creation date
3/14/2018 2:46:13 PM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
City Council
Council Document Type
Council Packet
Meeting Date
11/27/2017
Council Meeting Type
Regular
Jump to thumbnail
< previous set
next set >
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
202
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
View images
View plain text
Comprehensive Stormwater Management Plan <br />Northeast Lino Lakes Drainage Improvement Project <br />WSB Project No. 2929-79 Page 16 <br />Table 5-2. Proposed Land Uses by CSMP Region (in acres) <br /> <br />LAND USE DESCRIPTION HUGO EAST CENTRAL WEST TOTAL <br />Right-of-Way 0 14.1 27.9 2.5 44.5 <br />Large Lot Residential 46.1 0.2 0 0 46.3 <br />Low Density Residential 150.6 0.3 0 42.8 193.7 <br />Medium Density Residential 3.9 0.1 15.9 51.1 71 <br />High Density Residential 0 0 0 18.9 18.9 <br />Commercial 0.3 82.1 1 0 83.4 <br />Industrial 0 346.7 29.9 0 376.6 <br />Mixed Use 0 0 353.7 0 353.7 <br />Public/Quasi-Public 14.7 0 0 0 14.7 <br />Wetland Protection Zone 0 90.6 18.9 37.3 146.8 <br />Totals 215.6 534.1 447.3 152.6 1,349.6 <br /> <br />Like the revised existing conditions, the proposed models were updated and model interactions were <br />evaluated. <br />5.2 Hydraulic Updates <br />5.2.1 Upper Rice Creek InfoSWMM – Proposed Condit ions <br />The URC model contains the vast majority of the CSMP study area, so this model was updated to include <br />the re-routed ACD55 subcatchments from the CWC model and the re-routed ACD72 subcatchments from <br />the HWC model (Table 5-3 and Figure 13, Appendix A). It was assumed that future site grading would <br />eliminate the existing outflows into each of these systems. <br /> <br />Table 5-3. Proposed Upper Rice Creek Outflows <br /> <br />URC NODE 2-YR 24-HR 10-YR 24-HR 100-YR 24-HR 100-YR 10-DAY <br />LEAVING_SYSTEM2 <br />Revised Existing 0 1.7 30.0 5.9 <br />Proposed 0 0 0 0 <br />Difference [cfs] 0 -1.7 -30.0 -5.9 <br />LEAVING_SYSTEM3 <br />Revised Existing 0 0 0.7 0.6 <br />Proposed 0 0 0 0 <br />Difference [cfs] 0 0 -0.7 -0.6 <br />LEAVING_SYSTEM4 <br />Revised Existing 0 0 0.1 0
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.