My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Search
11-27-2017 Council Packet
LinoLakes
>
City Council
>
City Council Meeting Packets
>
1982-2020
>
2017
>
11-27-2017 Council Packet
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
3/14/2018 3:17:53 PM
Creation date
3/14/2018 2:46:13 PM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
City Council
Council Document Type
Council Packet
Meeting Date
11/27/2017
Council Meeting Type
Regular
Jump to thumbnail
< previous set
next set >
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
202
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
View images
View plain text
COUNCIL MINUTES November 13, 2017 <br />DRAFT <br />1 <br />CITY OF LINO LAKES 1 <br />MINUTES 2 <br /> 3 <br /> 4 <br />DATE : November 13, 2017 5 <br />TIME STARTED : 6:30 p.m. 6 <br />TIME ENDED : 7:30 p.m. 7 <br />MEMBERS PRESENT : Council Member Rafferty, Kusterman, Maher, 8 <br /> Manthey, and Mayor Reinert 9 <br />MEMBERS ABSENT : 10 <br /> 11 <br />Staff members present: City Administrator Jeff Karlson; Community Development Director Michael 12 <br />Grochala; Director of Public Safety John Swenson; City Engineer Diane Hankee; Finance Director 13 <br />Sarah Cotton; and City Clerk Julie Bartell 14 <br /> 15 <br />PUBLIC COMMENT 16 <br /> 17 <br />No one was present to address the council regarding a matter not on the agenda. 18 <br /> 19 <br />SETTING THE AGENDA 20 <br /> 21 <br />The agenda was approved as presented. 22 <br /> 23 <br />CONSENT AGENDA 24 <br /> 25 <br />Council Member Kusterman noted an expense relating to a bill of Ratwik, Roszak and Maloney, the 26 <br />city’s attorney. It is a monthly bill received from that contractor. It was clarified that the expense in 27 <br />question relates to a legal opinion sought regarding a resident who filed for city office who also works 28 <br />for the city’s engineering contractor, WSB & Associates; a written legal opinion was received and the 29 <br />cost was roughly $800. Council Member Kusterman questioned why this expenditure would be 30 <br />ordinary and necessary to the workings of the city. He has worked in accounting for many years and 31 <br />he doesn’t feel this would be ordinary. Were there conflict of interest checks on all candidates this 32 <br />year? 33 <br /> 34 <br />Administrator Karlson was asked to respond to the reasoning behind seeking that legal opinion and he 35 <br />explained that a member of the council raised questions about one candidate for city council that 36 <br />works for the city’s contracted engineering firm and he felt it rose to the level that the question should 37 <br />be posed to the City Attorney. He clarified that the question was originally posed to him by the 38 <br />mayor. 39 <br /> 40 <br />Mayor Reinert noted that the situation of having a conflict of interest as a member of the council is 41 <br />taken seriously by the City. 42 <br /> 43 <br />Council Member Rafferty concurred; he works for an architectural firm that could possibly have 44 <br />business with the City. He originally approached the City Administrator with the question and it was 45
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.