My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Search
02-11-13 Council Packet
LinoLakes
>
City Council
>
City Council Meeting Packets
>
1982-2020
>
2013
>
02-11-13 Council Packet
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
2/28/2014 3:54:44 PM
Creation date
4/9/2013 1:29:28 PM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
City Council
Council Document Type
Council Packet
Meeting Date
02/11/2013
Council Meeting Type
Regular
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
43
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
View images
View plain text
CITY COUNCIL WORK SESSION January 28, 2013 <br />DRAFT <br /> 2 <br />6Aii) Resolution No. 13 -06, Plans and Specification s and Advertise for Bids for the 45 <br />Otter Lake Improvement Project – Community Development Director Grochala 46 <br />explained that staff has completed the plan documents for a project starting in spring. 47 <br />This project is at a point where it is time to move or not move ahead. There is a proposal 48 <br />for a fast food restaurant already in place. Regarding the assessments, one property 49 <br />owner ha s chosen not to sign on at this time. The cost framework was reviewed and he 50 <br />noted a financing gap of about $80,000 past the assessments and extra funds from CSA. 51 <br />That gap may need to be covered by Municipal State Aid (MSA). T he entire project cost 52 <br />is M unicipal State Aid (MSA) eligible, however, since the city’s current MSA is totally 53 <br />committed to the interchange projects for at least ten years , c osts charg ed to that would be 54 <br />paid back when that is possible. There is one property owner from whom prope rty 55 <br />s hould be acquired but who has not responded to a request for purchase. That is why 56 <br />staff is looking at eminent domain, just in case an agreement on the property isn’t 57 <br />reached. Council Member Roeser noted that it is clear to everyone that the road wi ll be 58 <br />built and should be. Staff discussed the eminent domain process and the mayor 59 <br />recogniz ed that it is a process that is necessary and a standard in a case like this. The 60 <br />council discussed the possibility of a park and ride on one of the quadrants and Mr. 61 <br />Grochala noted that the Metro Council may be looking at a petition and waiver on that 62 <br />soon. In addition, Mr. Grochala noted that some sanitary sewer is being run into the area 63 <br />to serve Main Stree t properties and more so it allows for so me additional property . He 64 <br />summarized the following 6A items that also relate to the Otter Lake Road project. 65 <br />Council Member O’Donnell asked if there is risk associated with the gap financing and 66 <br />Mr. Grochala explained the scenario and what staff has done to make the fin ance plan as 67 <br />solid as possible including a n up front assessment benefit test. 68 <br /> 69 <br />6Aiii) Resolution No. 13 -09, Acquisition of Right of Way; 70 <br />6Aiv) Resolution No. 13 -10, Restriction of Parking; 71 <br />6Av) Resolution No. 13 -08, Declaring Intent to Bond 72 <br /> 73 <br />6B) R esolution No. 13 -05, Pay Request 3F (Final) and Compensating Change Order 74 <br />No. 2 for the Otter Lake Service Road Culvert Replacement – City Engineer Wedel 75 <br />explained that this 2011 project is complete and this would be the final payment. There 76 <br />were some cos ts under estimate and some additi onal work with associated costs; the 77 <br />result is the amount of the change order. 78 <br /> 79 <br />6C) Resolution No. 13 -13, Plans and Specifications for the CSAH 14 Pedestrian 80 <br />Bridge over I -35W – City Engineer Wedel reported that the resolu tion provides local 81 <br />approval to a federally funded Anoka County project to construct a pedestrian/bicycle 82 <br />bridge. The city has no financial obligation to the project. The bridge will tie into the 83 <br />regional trail and possibly a future trail on the north. The city will have maintenance 84 <br />(plowing) responsibility. 85 <br /> 86 <br /> 87 <br /> 88 <br /> 89 <br /> 90
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.