Laserfiche WebLink
COUNCIL MINUTES January 28, 201 3 <br />DRAFT <br />4 <br />in February, with contract approval in March. A portion of right -of -way acquisition may require the 135 <br />use of eminent domain. Council Member Stoesz asked about the temporary pond and what safety 136 <br />precautions will be taken as well as how the public will b e notified that it is temporary. Staff 137 <br />e xplained that a fence around the pond is planned and a sign will be considered . 138 <br /> 139 <br />Council Member Roeser moved to approve Resolution No. 13 -06 as presented. Council Member 140 <br />O’Donnell seconded the motion. Motion car ried on a unanimous voice vote. 141 <br /> 142 <br /> iii) Resolution No. 13 -09, Acquisition of Right -of -Way – City Engineer Wedel explained 143 <br />that the improvement was ordered in June 2012 and offers made for right of way after that time. One 144 <br />property owner has concurred an d one property owner has not responded. To keep the project on 145 <br />track and meet timeframes for the proposed development, it is now necessary for the city council to 146 <br />authorize the use of eminent domain. An appraiser has provided valuation information and s taff is 147 <br />now requesting that the city attorney proceed. Mayor Reinert explained where improvements are 148 <br />proposed and suggested that nothing will happen in a very development ripe area without these 149 <br />road/utility improvements. The people that own the land a re all businesspersons, want the 150 <br />improvements and will benefit from the improvements. The city hopes to get the extension done and 151 <br />he finds it to be appropriate. 152 <br /> 153 <br />Council Member O’Donnell moved to approve Resolution No. 13 -09 as presented. Council Member 154 <br />Roeser seconded the motion. Motion carried on a unanimous voice vote. 155 <br /> 156 <br /> iv) Resolution No. 13 -10, Restriction of Parking – City Engineer Wedel explained that 157 <br />because there may be MSA funds included in the project, design plans must follow MSA 158 <br />requiremen ts. This restriction of parking is a requirement. 159 <br /> 160 <br />Council Member Rafferty moved to approve Resolution No. 13 -10 as presented. Council Member 161 <br />Stoesz seconded the motion. Motion carried on a unanimous voice vote. 162 <br /> 163 <br /> v) Resolution No. 13 -08, Declaring Intent to Bond - Community Development Director 164 <br />Grochala explained that the project is planned to be financed through the issuance of general 165 <br />obligation bonds. This non -binding resolution follows federal regulations to allow that bonding. 166 <br /> 167 <br />Council Member Roeser moved to approve Resolution No. 13 -08 as presented. Council Member 168 <br />O’Donnell seconded the motion. Motion carried on a unanimous voice vote. 169 <br /> 170 <br />6B) Resolution No. 13 -05, Approving Pay Request 3F (Final) and Compensating Change Order 171 <br />No. 2, for the Otter Lake Service Road Culvert Replacement – City Engineer Wedel reported that 172 <br />this project to replace a deteriorated culvert was primarily completed in 2012. Staff is requesting a 173 <br />final payment on the project that includes a change order. 174 <br /> 175 <br />Council Mem ber O’Donnell moved to approve Resolution No. 13 -05 as presented. Council Member 176 <br />Rafferty seconded the motion. Motion carried on a unanimous voice vote. 177 <br /> 178