Laserfiche WebLink
CITY COUNCIL WORK SESSION February 4, 2013 <br />DRAFT <br /> 1 <br />CITY OF LINO LAKES 1 <br />MINUTES 2 <br /> 3 <br />DATE : February 4, 2013 4 <br />TIME STARTED : 5:30 p.m. 5 <br />TIME ENDED : 10:00 p.m. 6 <br />MEMBERS PRESENT : Council M ember Stoesz , O’Donnell, 7 <br /> Rafferty (arrived at 5:45 pm), Roeser and 8 <br />Mayor Reinert 9 <br />MEMBERS ABSENT : None 10 <br /> 11 <br /> 12 <br />Staff members present: City Administrator Jeff Karlson; Economic Development 13 <br />Coordinator Mary Alice Divine; Environmental Coordinator Marty Asles on; Community 14 <br />Development Director Michael Grochala; Public Services Director Rick DeGardner; 15 <br />Public Safety Director John Swenson; Finance Director Al Rolek. 16 <br /> 17 <br />1. Water and Sewer Utility Rate Study, Springsted Incorporated – Nick Dragisich 18 <br />and Patty Kettel s gave a PowerPoint presentation reviewing the results of the utility rate 19 <br />study they produced. Mr. Dragisich reviewed the water rate section, noting that the last 20 <br />time the city raised water rates was 2008. It was pointed out that water conservation 21 <br />effo rts can oddly result in a cost increase. Patty Kettels reviewed the sewer rate section . 22 <br /> 23 <br />The Mayor suggested that the report recommends that the city raise rates as soon as 24 <br />possible. He would prefer to do a “drill down” on costs included in the water and sewer 25 <br />rates to see if there can be savings. He recommends looking at other cities to see what 26 <br />they are doing right. A rate increase is never easy and he’d like to find another way to 27 <br />meet the needs of the utility. Mr. Dragisich suggested that a drill d own is a good exercise 28 <br />and he ’d recommend that the city look at other cities that are truly comparable to Lino 29 <br />Lakes. Public Services Director DeGardner added that there are a lot of variables that 30 <br />impact costs, includ ing density, location of water, qua lify of water, treatment needs, etc. 31 <br />Mr. Dragisich noted that some of the biggest drivers of cost is depreciation and other 32 <br />things that are not in the city’s control; the sewer charges are mainly driven by the 33 <br />Metropolitan Council. Counc il Member Roeser remarked that with interest rates close to 34 <br />nothin g, the city may be losing by putting aside money for the future of the system. 35 <br />Finance Director Rolek noted some capital costs that are incurred regularly. 36 <br /> 37 <br />The mayor said that more discussion is needed s o he anticipates seeing the matter on a 38 <br />future work session agenda. 39 <br /> 40 <br /> 6. Adam Johnson Docks – Community Development Director Grochala explained that 41 <br />Mr. Johnson, who has previously petitioned for a cartway, has now constructed two 42 <br />docks, one on each side of the channel. The city doesn’t have jurisdiction over the work 43 <br />– the water way is controlled by the Minnesota Department of Natural Resources and 44 <br />bridge permits fall under the Rice Creek Watershed District (RCWD). Mr. Grochala 45