My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Search
02-25-13 Council Packet
LinoLakes
>
City Council
>
City Council Meeting Packets
>
1982-2020
>
2013
>
02-25-13 Council Packet
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
2/28/2014 3:56:04 PM
Creation date
4/9/2013 1:30:52 PM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
City Council
Council Document Type
Council Packet
Meeting Date
05/25/2013
Council Meeting Type
Regular
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
69
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
View images
View plain text
CITY COUNCIL WORK SESSION February 4, 2013 <br />DRAFT <br /> 4 <br />5. Five -Year Financial Forecast – Finance Director Role k reviewed the updated 134 <br />forecast. He noted changes in assumptions to the operating forecast and discussed 135 <br />questions as follows: 136 <br /> 137 <br />- tax capacity rate increase; 138 <br />- assumes a successful referendum under the current charter; 139 <br />- no impact under the Governor’s b udget proposal; 140 <br />- discussion of YMCA debt and how long it would be in place; 141 <br />- tax base in 2014 changes from flat to a moderate decrease; 142 <br />- capital equipment replacement grows after 2013; 143 <br />- recreation complex – assumes only funding to pay on the debt; 144 <br />- ro ad reconstruction – assumes some funding and no change to the city charter; 145 <br />- the capital improvement program includes programs included in the comp plan and 146 <br />utility plan. 147 <br /> 148 <br />Staff is looking for direction from the council on the forecast. The mayor noted that he 149 <br />sees the need to do what is necessary to keep a handle on the levy; a fifteen percent 150 <br />increase over the next five years he doesn’t see. The mayor would like to also see a 151 <br />forecast b uilt on different assumptions; how can rates go up when the revenu e is going 152 <br />down? Council Member Roeser suggested that revenues as well as economies and 153 <br />te ch nology would be a good plan. Council members suggest ed something like going out 154 <br />for bid on information technology services. The council would like to see a docum ent 155 <br />that better highlights priorities and the mayor recommended setting up a special session to 156 <br />gain a more comprehensive approach to a forecast. The mayor would also like to include 157 <br />discussion on next year’s budget; he needs to understand what the overal l figures 158 <br />represent. Other council members spoke in favor of looking for consolidations, 159 <br />efficiencies and outsourcing. 160 <br /> 161 <br />7. Charter Commission Expenditures – Mayor Reinert explained that he attended the 162 <br />last Charter Commission meeting (following last fall ’s elect ion). A commission member 163 <br />said that the commission should be paying attention to the vote that occurred on the 164 <br />charter amendment – in that a majority voted for a change. There were some ideas raised 165 <br />by commissioner members and some wanted to forw ard those ideas to the council. A 166 <br />vote was taken and there were comments from some saying they did not want to work 167 <br />with the council. Commissioner Storberg said that she sees value in the amendment and 168 <br />she moved for a joint meeting with the council to di scuss the amendment or other 169 <br />suggestions to move forward. May or Reinert said such a meeting c ould be facilitated by 170 <br />someone not on the council or the commission. The mayor has spoken with Charter 171 <br />Commission Chair Chris Lyden, confirmed the motion to have a joint meeting and 172 <br />confirmed his support to have atto rneys for both groups present and that their attorney be 173 <br />paid outside of their $1,500 annual budget (just for this one meeting). The mayor said he 174 <br />also hea rd that the commission has a standing concern about losing their minute taking 175 <br />services (Timesavers) and he would support having that service again. A council 176 <br />member replied that if there are to be two attorneys at a joint meeting , it should be agreed 177
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.