Laserfiche WebLink
CITY COUNCIL WORK SESSIO N March 4, 2013 <br />DRAFT <br /> 3 <br />certain situation and he wonders if that is a desirable situation . He has i n the past 91 <br />supported a strict free market system for these stores, but he’s chang ed his mind after 92 <br />becoming aware of the regulations and restrictions already in place for the stores. The 93 <br />business owners have brought forward some good arguments – the government is so 94 <br />restrictive that they cannot move into other areas as other business es can in order to 95 <br />profit. Council Member O’Donnell concurred that he is concerned with the unintended 96 <br />impact the restrictions could have. 97 <br /> 98 <br />The mayor recommends that the item stay on the agenda for further discussion and new 99 <br />ideas. 100 <br /> 101 <br />5. Animal Regulat ions – Police Chief Swenson reviewed his staff report on the city’s 102 <br />existing dog regulations. The concern about owners not cleaning up after their dogs is 103 <br />directly related to responsibility. Since there is a leash law in place in the city, the 104 <br />violation on picking up after dogs is usually related to allowing a dog off leash. He noted 105 <br />some language in the animal control regulations that require s people to carry a bag 106 <br />suitable to remove dog waste when they are walking and that the language doesn’t in fact 107 <br />require the person to use the bag. That’s a small change that could be made. He also 108 <br />pointed out that for an officer to cite someone, the officer must witness the violation. He 109 <br />ad ded that the Police Department will soon have a YouTube video running on all city 110 <br />animal regulations. 111 <br /> 112 <br />Public Services Director DeGardner explained that the neighborhood where this 113 <br />complaint originated has a history of this type of complaint. As a result his department 114 <br />sent out a letter to area residents reminding them of th e rules so there can be no excuse 115 <br />that people aren’t aware of the regulations. He added that the neighborhood will be 116 <br />receiving a “doggie pot” this spring (for disposal of animal waste bags). Council Member 117 <br />Rafferty suggested that this is too often is an issue that arises from a neighbor dispute and 118 <br />it’s hard to get to that level of the problem. Counci l Member Roeser asked if the Pol ice 119 <br />Department is seeing good response to their videos since he realizes that education is an 120 <br />important element. 121 <br /> 122 <br />The cou ncil concurred that no ordinance amendment is n eeded. The mayor suggested 123 <br />that for the resident who complained, there isn’t a clear fix but staff will send another 124 <br />letter to the violator(s). 125 <br /> 126 <br />6. Charter Commission Expenditures (discussion continued from February 4 work 127 <br />session) – Charter Commissioner Kelly Gunderson reviewed written information she had 128 <br />provided on the cost of meeting minutes services through the Timesaver’s company. 129 <br />She noted that at the last Charter Commission meeting, Mayor Reinert a ddressed the 130 <br />Commission about developing a better relationship between the two groups. Having the 131 <br />services of a professional minute taker is one issue identified. Ms. Gunderson indicated 132 <br />that the Commission is interested in having a secretarial service f or minutes as was done 133 <br />in the past. The Commission has generally only used those outside services for their 134