Laserfiche WebLink
City of Lino Lakes SWMP | February 8, 2013 Draft | 72 <br />Actions identified by Issue Category <br />Additional <br />Issue(s) <br />Addressed <br />Goals <br />Addressed <br />Policies <br />Addressed <br /> 4.11.1C, <br />4.11.2B, <br />4.11.2C, <br />4.11.2D <br />FINANCING <br />Pursue grants through the RCWD’s Urban Stormwater <br />Remediation Program to assist in the funding of projects that <br />will reduce the impact of existing development on local water <br />resources. <br />NA 4.12.2 4.12.2A <br />Pursue funding support from VLAWMO for projects in the <br />Amelia Lake watershed. NA 4.12.2 4.12.2B <br />Review and evaluate funding sources for surface water <br />management including ad valorem taxes, development <br />charges, grants and user fees. <br />NA 4.12.1 4.12.1A, <br />4.1 2.1B <br />Update and continue to implement Trunk Surface Water <br />Management Fee System. NA 4.12.1 4.12.1A, <br />4.12.1B <br />Implement the updated Parks, Greenways and Trail System <br />Plan through (1) dedication of parks, greenways, open space <br />and trail corridors or (2) Park Dedication Fee. Review park <br />dedication fee annually to ensure adequate funding for parks, <br />greenways, open space and trail system development. <br />NA 4.12.1 4.12.1A, <br />4.12.1B <br />Pursue funding through Federal and State grant opportunities NA 4.12.2 4.12.2A <br /> <br /> <br />5.2. Priority RMU Specific Actions <br />This section includes implementation activities that have been identified for the three highest priority <br />Resource Management Units (RMUs ), or subwatersheds, in the City of Lino Lakes: <br /> <br /> Reshanau RMU <br /> Marshan RMU <br /> Clearwater Creek RMU. <br /> <br />These RMUs have been identified as a higher priority for the City of Lino because they have the potential <br />for developing sooner than other portions of the City and have been more closely evaluated through the <br />Alternative Urban Area wide Review (AUAR) process or the development of other Master Plans. <br /> <br />Like Section 5.1 City -Wide Actions, this section includes RMU specific implementation activities <br />previously identified by the City or other entity (e.g. RCWD, VLAWMO, Anoka County, etc.) in past <br />planning efforts . However, this section does add a schematic to help visualize the multi -functional <br />greenway corridor using a general cross -section that the City can use to demonstrate its vision and goals <br />to developers early in the land develop ment process. The information provided in this section will form <br />the basis for the development of a more in -depth Subwatershed Plan s for each RMU which will clearly <br />lay the framework for how the City would like to see future development tie into the multi -functional <br />greenway corridor. <br /> <br />The use of RMU corridor plans is to maximize the value and benefit with efficient use of the corridors for <br />multiple public functions: flood control, conveyance infrastructure, water quality and volume treatment, <br />public trai l systems, and habitat corridor enhancement. Figure 26 below illustrates the variable cross <br />section configurations that implement the multifunctional greenway corridor. Each of the RMU’s would <br />have unique configurations due to the variable landscape sett ings of the major drainageways.