My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Search
05-28-13 Council Packet
LinoLakes
>
City Council
>
City Council Meeting Packets
>
1982-2020
>
2013
>
05-28-13 Council Packet
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
2/28/2014 3:41:24 PM
Creation date
5/24/2013 1:12:08 PM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
City Council
Council Document Type
Council Packet
Meeting Date
05/28/2013
Council Meeting Type
Regular
Jump to thumbnail
< previous set
next set >
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
237
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
View images
View plain text
COUNCIL MINUTES May 13, 2013 <br />DRAFT <br />4 <br /> 136 <br />City Planner Larsen explained that the project is a residential subdivision project that originally came 137 <br />to the city in 2006 proposed by Integra Homes. With the economic downturn, the project was not 138 <br />developed as planned but has not been picked up by a different developer, Schwieters Investments of 139 <br />Lino Lakes, LLC. This is a conservat ion devel opment with 31 lots and six out lots. Resolution No. 140 <br />13 -56 would amend the 2006 resol ution that approved the preliminary PUD to change the language 141 <br />regarding maintenance of rain gardens since it has been determined that the small rain gardens 142 <br />wo uldn’t work well. Mayor Reinert confirmed that the rain garden agreement included a fund set up 143 <br />to cover maintenance costs; what is the status of that fund? Ms. Larsen explained that there was no 144 <br />money in the fund at this point. Mayor Reinert noted the location of the development (off Holly 145 <br />Drive) and lauded the addition of this conservation development. The mayor did ask about the impact 146 <br />of a future development that could cause new residents to drive through this area; he’d like to see that 147 <br />dealt with up front. Staff indicated that a sign would be installed about any new development. 148 <br /> 149 <br />Council Member Roeser moved to approve Resolution No. 13 -56 as presented. Council Member 150 <br />O’Donnell seconded the motion. Motion carried on a unanimous voice vote. 151 <br /> 152 <br />City Planner Larsen then explained that Resolution No. 13 -57 relates to the final plan/final plat for the 153 <br />development. She indicated the plans on an overhead projection. She pointed out the amenities 154 <br />(trails, conservation areas). There will eventually be a full conservation management plan associated 155 <br />with the development. The Planning and Zoning Board recommends approval of the resolution which 156 <br />includes many of the expectations and requirement s attached to the approval. Council Member 157 <br />Roeser asked if the city has received any comments from neighbors to the development. Community 158 <br />Development Director Grochala responded that the preliminary approval in 2006 included lots of 159 <br />discussion with the neighborhood. The main issue was about grading and hauling so that will receive 160 <br />staff attention. 161 <br /> 162 <br />Council Member Roeser moved to approve Resolution No. 13 -57 as presented. Council Member 163 <br />O’Donnell seconded the motion. Motion carried on a unanimous voice vote. 164 <br /> 165 <br />6C) Main Street Shoppes 166 <br /> 167 <br />i. Resolution No. 13 -59, A pproving the Preliminary and Final Plat for the Main Street 168 <br />Shoppes 169 <br /> 170 <br />City Planner Larsen explained that Resolution No. 13 -59 relates to a commercial development at the 171 <br />northeast quadrant of I -35E and Main Street. Basically it is a commercial subdivision for Lot 1, 172 <br />Block 1 proposed for a new restaurant (McDonald ’s ) site. It is also related to the extension of Otter 173 <br />L ake Road planned by the city and the approvals of the plat are cont ingent on that extension. The 174 <br />Planning and Zoning Board recommends appr oval with conditions included. 175 <br /> 176 <br />Council Member O’Donnell moved to approve Resolution No. 13 -59 as presented. Council Member 177 <br />Roeser seconded the motion. Motion carried on a unanimous voice vote. 178 <br /> 179
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.