Laserfiche WebLink
<br /> <br />Option 3 would be a policy issue for the City since the City has not paid for the initial <br />p aving of any streets within the City previously. An example would be Pine Street which <br />was just paved a couple years ago and was assessed 100% to the adjacent property <br />owners. <br /> <br />Option 4 could be a possibility if we are able to prove the benefit to the adj acent property <br />owners and assess 100% of the cost. However, a portion of the property along 74 th Street <br />is City owned and therefore it would be responsible for a portion of the assessments. We <br />would need to consult with the City Attorney to determine if this would trigger the City <br />Charter and require a voter referendum. Regardless of the referendum, following the <br />State Statute 429 process would push the paving into 2014 and would eliminate the cost <br />benefit of paving the adjacent Marvy Street and Jon Aven ue this year. <br /> <br />Requested Council Direction <br /> <br /> <br />Staff is looking for City Council direction on how to proceed with this project. <br /> <br />