Laserfiche WebLink
Preliminary Tax Levy. For the first time in 2013 , the pr eliminary levy includes a voter - <br />appr oved levy of $181,151 for the signalization projects at the Lake/Main and <br />Birch/Ware intersections. Slight increas es for existing debt service have reduced the levy <br />amounts available for operations. <br /> <br />P roperty values declined 0.69% for 2014, a significant improvement from declines of <br />7.96% in 2013, 8.25% in 2012, and 10.43% in 2011 . The preliminary operating levy has <br />been reduced by $61,616 to reflect the drop in values. However, the addition of the <br />voter -approved levy results in an increase in the total pr eliminary levy of $125,701 . <br /> <br />Levy Limits. The State Legislature imposed a levy limit on counties and cities with a <br />population over 2,500 for 2014 . The levy limit base for 2014 is the greater of the 2013 or <br />2012 levies, net of approved special levies (primarily debt service levies). The levy limit <br />base is increased by a factor of 3% and reduced by LGA received from the state to arrive <br />at the entity’s levy limit. The MN Department of Revenue will certify our final levy limit <br />on or before September 1. Based on our calculations according to the above formula, the <br />City’s estimated levy limit for 2014 is $7,408,603. The City’s projected levy subject to <br />the levy limit (net of special levies) is $7,128,922, leaving the pr eliminary levy $279,681 <br />below the es timated levy limit. <br /> <br />Discussion. Staff is ready to discuss the budget draft with the Council during the initial <br />budget work session. The remainder of the budget is very lean. The greatest potential for <br />meaningful cost reduction would be achieved through staffing adjustments. Staff <br />reductions in the past have come through an early retirement incentive, staff furloughs, <br />attrition, vacant positions, or through position eliminations . Careful consideration to the <br />effect on service areas and service levels m ust be giv en to achieve the desired level of <br />services while considering quality of life vs. cost of services for city residents. <br />Consideration must also be given to the use of one -time funding sources and the potential <br />effects on future budgets. <br /> <br />B udget work sessions may be scheduled at the discretion of the Council to achieve the <br />desired budget level for 201 4 . The Council must take action at the September 9 meeting <br />on the preliminary tax levy and set a public hearing date in December on the budget and <br />t ax levy. The preliminary levy set at this time may not be increased thereafter, but may <br />be lowered before approving a final levy in December. <br />