01-12-2017 Charter Packet - Laserfiche WebLink

Home Search

Charter Commission April 28, 2016 Page 4 135 Commissioner Bretoi summarized that although there were differing opinions regarding ward 136 representation, the Commission did reach consensus to draft an amendment to move forward to 137 the ballot, which would allow the residents of Lino Lakes to make that decision. 138 139 Commissioner Turcotte stated that in his opinion it would be best to have an outside neutral party 140 draft potential ward boundaries. 141 142 Commissioner Juni asked if the Commission would like Mr. Kaardal to draft possible language 143 to address the comments made by Attorney Langel in order to amend the language, if necessary, 144 to move the question forward to the ballot. 145 146 Commissioner Turcotte stated that he would also like an opinion as to whether certain aspects are 147 correct, noting that other cities are successfully implementing the items that this Commission has 148 wanted to do in the past and has been told is not allowed. 149 150 Commissioner Johnson asked if there are more issues other than the three points identified by 151 Attorney Langel. 152 153 Commissioner Lyden stated that he would like Mr. Kaardal to address the legal issues identified 154 by Attorney Langel as he has that expertise. 155 156 Mr. Kaardal stated that in his opinion the City Council and Attorney Langel are going to review 157 the text prior to submission to the ballot. He stated that if the Commission wants to get the item 158 on the ballot, his opinion would be to address the items identified by Attorney Langel rather than 159 attempt to fight with that opinion which would only delay and possibly mean that the item would 160 not go onto the ballot. He stated that he could draft potential language to address the items 161 identified and then have an independent check completed to ensure the language is legally 162 compliant. He noted that there is the possibility that Attorney Langel could find other items he 163 does not agree with, but then the Commission could gather again to address those comments in 164 order to submit to the ballot. 165 166 Commissioner Juni stated that if the Commission wants this item to move forward on the ballot a 167 decision needs to be made as to whether the Commission can live with the language that the City 168 Council determines ward boundaries and if so, then the item could perhaps move ahead to the 169 ballot. 170 171 MOTION by Commissioner Bretoi, seconded by Commissioner Juni, to allow the governing 172 body, specifically the City Council, to draw up the ward boundaries. 173 174 Further discussion: Vice Chair Devaney stated that he agrees that the Commission will be 175 stonewalled if they do not allow the City Council to draw the ward boundaries. He stated that the 176 membership of the City Council has changed and he feels that there is now better representation. 177 He stated that he would support Mr. Kaardal addressing the three items specified by Attorney 178 Langel in order to move the amendment forward. 179 4