My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Search
08-26-13 Council Packet
LinoLakes
>
City Council
>
City Council Meeting Packets
>
1982-2020
>
2013
>
08-26-13 Council Packet
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
2/28/2014 1:51:13 PM
Creation date
8/27/2013 11:20:13 AM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
City Council
Council Document Type
Council Packet
Meeting Date
08/26/2013
Council Meeting Type
Regular
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
152
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
View images
View plain text
CITY COUNCIL WORK SESSION August 5, 2013 <br />DRAFT <br /> 3 <br />forward with an ordinance to change the city code to concur with state law. The council 90 <br />directed staff to put the ordinance on the next council agenda. 91 <br /> 92 <br />8. Ordinance – Utility Fees for Vacant Propertie s (City Council Agenda Item 2A ) – 93 <br />Finance Director Rolek recalled that the council received a request from a property 94 <br />owner to review the city’s billing system for vacant property since the city was charging a 95 <br />utility r ate they felt was not fair. Staff has review ed what other cities are doing and has 96 <br />found that a minimum base charge is more appropriate. The ordinance before the council 97 <br />would make that change in the city’s fee schedule. The policy would put the onus on the 98 <br />property owner to inform the city of a vacant status. The property owner of the former 99 <br />Bobby & Steve’s Auto World who brought this matter forward will also receive a 100 <br />reduction in charges retroactive to the time when their building became vacant. Th e 101 <br />council confirmed that property owners should be charged the base rate back to the time 102 <br />their property is vacated. The council also confirmed that this type of base charge will 103 <br />only apply to business properties. 104 <br /> 105 <br />10. 2014 Budget – Director of Finance R olek explained th at the first draft of the 2014 106 <br />b udget is before the council. T his is a budget proposal, not discussion of a budget gap. 107 <br />The budget presented is a 1.2 percent increase from the 2013 adopted budget, it maintains 108 <br />service levels, maintains street maintenance efforts, includes funding for a t wo percent 109 <br />wage increase , adjustment s for the sales tax exemption, maintains personnel at the 2013 110 <br />level (with the exception of the Economic Development Coordinator position), presumes 111 <br />increases in fuel a nd utility costs and no new initiatives. It does include use of general 112 <br />fund reserve (not i n excess of the city’s reserve policy) and includes funding of a police 113 <br />officer position wit h one -time forfeiture funds , and a slight increase in debt services. For 114 <br />the first time, the voter approved levy for the two intersection projects is included. 115 <br />Property values reflected in this budget decreased by under one percent , an improvement 116 <br />over the past few years. There is an increase in levy amount due to the ad dition of the 117 <br />voter approved projects. Mayor Reinert confirmed that without that voter approved levy, 118 <br />the proposed budget is under last year’s. Mr. Rolek disc ussed a state levy limit projected 119 <br />for the year and that the budget proposal falls under the lim it. He reviewed the estimated 120 <br />levy chart, net tax capacity calculations, e stimated general fund revenues (building permit 121 <br />revenue is expected to rise) and general fund expenditures. Mayor Reinert remarked that 122 <br />an upgrade in cable equipment would be appro priate soon since some of that equipment is 123 <br />literally failing during council broadcasts. Council Member Stoesz requested that line 124 <br />items Fleet Management and Government Buildings under Public Services also be broken 125 <br />down by department to allow a closer lo ok; Public Services Director DeGardner indicated 126 <br />that he can do a f leet summary by month or year . 127 <br /> 128 <br />Council Member Rafferty suggested that he remains interested in cost reductions t hat 129 <br />could be accomplished without personnel reduction. The council will take some time to 130 <br />review the budget and look for further economies. There will be a wo rk session 131 <br />scheduled for that purpose before the next council meeting. 132 <br /> 133
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.