Laserfiche WebLink
21.3Require a traffic impact analysis for all development projects within the AUAR <br />area. The traffic impact analysis will assist the City and other road authorities in <br />determining the appropriate mitigation measures that are required to mitigate <br />impacts of a specific development proposal. <br />21.4Work with appropriate road authorities to mitigate the impact of the additional <br />traffic on the on the regional system, specifically Interstates 35W and 35E, by <br />reconstructing each to provide a six-lane cross-section consistent with the <br />recommendations outlined in the I-35 IRC. It should be noted that it was <br />determined that an expansion will be necessary even without the development <br />scenarios used in this analysis. As the interstates serve a much larger area, the <br />projected growth of the entire Twin Cities region should warrant expansion by the <br />year 2030. <br />21.5Prioritize alternative travel modes within the AUAR study area and require <br />project proposers to address alternative travel modes (e.g., buses, bicyclists, and <br />pedestrians) by identifying appropriate accommodations. <br />21.6Consider the need for additional infrastructure improvements (see item #21.2) in <br />future updates or amendments to the Comprehensive Plan. Submit the plan <br />update to the appropriate agencies (i.e., FHWA, MnDOT, Met Council, etc.). <br />21.7Require project proposers to follow all appropriate guidelines and policies related <br />to traffic nose and noise walls. <br />21.8Require that site plans for each of the developments include measures suchas <br />appropriate setback distances, earthen berms, noise walls, and appropriate site <br />design to reduce the impact of traffic noise to residential areas. <br />21.9Continue to require the implementation of the conditions of approval for the Eagle <br />Brook Church relating to mitigating traffic impacts. <br />21.10Achieve effective traffic operations within the city by requiring that site plans <br />make use of access management practices to promote sate, effective traffic flow. <br />21.11Require project proposers to follow the Anoka County Highway Department <br />Development Review Process Manual (dated December 2003.) <br />21.12Continue to coordinate capital improvement programming with applicable <br />transportation authorities. <br />9 <br /> <br />