My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Search
09-03-13 Council Packet
LinoLakes
>
City Council
>
City Council Meeting Packets
>
1982-2020
>
2013
>
09-03-13 Council Packet
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
2/28/2014 1:51:27 PM
Creation date
9/25/2013 8:55:46 AM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
City Council
Council Document Type
Council Packet
Meeting Date
09/03/2013
Council Meeting Type
Work Session Regular
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
98
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
View images
View plain text
Alternativesfor consideration <br />1.Eliminate the one perquarter temporary sign permit restriction and provide for a <br />temporary sign allowanceof90 days annually. This is roughly equivalent to one <br />week a month. The City currently allows one permit each quarter for a maximum <br />of 17 days each totaling 68 days. Business owners would determine dates but <br />display would be limited to a certain periodsuch as no more than 14consecutive <br />days. <br />2.Allow for the option of per event permitsoran annual permit. Business would <br />be allowed to choose the permit that best meets their needs. Owners choosing an <br />annual permit would need to specify dates in advance. While the annual permit <br />fee would likely be higher than the single permit fee, the one-time fee would be <br />less overall than purchasing several individual permits. <br />The P & Z had inquired about a no fee allowance for non-profits. Staff did <br />review this with the City Attorney and concluded that there is no basis for this <br />allowance and that it would constitute a violation of equal protection regulations. <br />In simpler terms,zoning regulations need to treat similar uses equally. <br />3.Allow one banner per property as part of base signage. Limit to a maximum of 32 <br />square feet. One sign would be allowed per parcel. Multi-tenantfacilities would <br />need to be coordinated with owner.Banner would still need to be affixed to the <br />building as required by current regulations. This provision would essentially <br />mean an expansion of our maximum wall signage requirements. <br />4.Increase allowance for wall signage for institutional uses in residential areas. <br />Staff also suggestsan amendment to allow for both a wall sign and a monument <br />sign for these uses.The City currently allows one ground sign of 32 sq.ft. orone <br />wall sign with a maximum size of 50 sq.ft. Staff would recommend 50 sq.ft.for <br />ground signs and 80 sq.ft.for wall signs. <br />5.Change limit on wall signage in commercial districts to one per façade limited to <br />a percentage of the wall surface area.The city currently limits the number of wall <br />signs to one unless the business fronts 2 streets. In this case a second sign is <br />allowed. The proposed change would simply allow limited amount of signage on <br />each wall oriented to each abutting street. <br />REQUESTED BOARD DIRECTION <br />Staff is seeking board input on the suggested modifications. <br />ATTACHMENTS <br />1.Sign Survey(from December 12 meeting) <br /> <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.