My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Search
01-14-2019 Council Packet
LinoLakes
>
City Council
>
City Council Meeting Packets
>
1982-2020
>
2019
>
01-14-2019 Council Packet
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
11/30/2021 8:52:38 AM
Creation date
2/28/2019 11:23:25 AM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
City Council
Council Document Type
Council Packet
Meeting Date
01/14/2019
Council Meeting Type
Regular
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
167
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
View images
View plain text
The general purpose and intent of the General Provisions section of the zoning ordinance <br />is to assure compatibility of uses' to prevent urban blight, deterioration and decay; and <br />to enhance the health, safety and general welfare of the residents of the community. <br />The variance to allow for the street and side yard setbacks is in harmony with the <br />ordinance. The existing house was constructed in 1977 with the setback encroachments <br />and has not caused urban blight, deterioration or decay. The existing rural residential <br />house continues to provide high value and enhances the health, safety and general <br />welfare of the residents of the community. <br />2. The variance shall be consistent with the comprehensive plan. <br />The variance request is consistent with the comprehensive plan. Per the 2030 <br />Comprehensive Plan, the property is guided for Low Density Residential land use. The <br />existing land use is single family residential with a single family dwelling unit and <br />attached garage. <br />3. There shall be practical difficulties in complying with the ordinance "Practical <br />difficulties," as used in connection with the granting of a variance, means that the <br />property owner proposes to use the property in a reasonable manner not permitted by the <br />ordinance. Economic considerations alone do not constitute practical difficulties. <br />Practical difficulties include, but are not limited to, inadequate access to direct sunlight <br />for solar energy systems. <br />The property owner proposes to use the property in a reasonable manner as a single <br />family detached dwelling. The existing house was built in 1977 and there is no proposed <br />change in use. There would be considerable economic burden to require the property to <br />comply with the setback requirements. <br />4. The plight of the landowner shall be due to circumstances unique to the property not <br />created by the landowner. <br />The plight of the landowner was created by the contractor constructing a house in 1977 <br />that did not meet setback requirements. <br />5. The variance shall not alter the essential character of the locality. <br />The variance will not alter the essential character of the locality which is a rural <br />residential single family neighborhood with houses. <br />6. A variance shall not be granted for any use that is not allowed under the ordinance for <br />property in the zoning district where the subject site is located. <br />The variance will not be granted for any use that is not allowed under the ordinance for <br />property in the zoning district. The property is zoned R-X, Rural Executive and single <br />family detached homes are permitted uses. <br />2 <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.