Laserfiche WebLink
Local Water Supply Plan Template —December 8, 2015 <br />If yes, describe conservation practices that you are already implementing, such as: pricing, system <br />improvements, education, regulation, appliance retrofitting, enforcement, etc. <br />The City regularly evaluates its water fees. It currently has a conservation water rate structure, it <br />regularly conducts infrastructure improvements to reduce watermain breaks, and it promotes water <br />conservation in its newsletter. The City is in the process of implementing its Wellhead Protection Plan, <br />and it allocated $10,000 in 2016 for Wellhead Implementation. <br />If no, complete Table 21 to summarize conservation actions taken since the adoption of the 2006 water <br />supply plan. <br />Table 21. Implementation of previous ten-year Conservation Plan <br />2006 Plan Commitments <br />Action Taken? <br />Change Water Rates Structure to provide conservation pricing <br />0 Yes <br />❑ No <br />Water Supply System Improvements (e.g. leak repairs, valve replacements, etc.) <br />0 Yes <br />❑ No <br />Educational Efforts <br />0 Yes <br />❑ No <br />New water conservation ordinances <br />0 Yes <br />❑ No <br />Rebate or retrofitting Program (e.g. for toilet, faucets, appliances, showerheads, dish <br />washers, washing machines, irrigation systems, rain barrels, water softeners, etc. <br />❑ Yes <br />0 No <br />Enforcement <br />0 Yes <br />❑ No <br />Describe Other <br />❑ Yes <br />❑ No <br />What are the results you have seen from the actions in Table 21 and how were results measured? <br />From 2012 to current, the City has seen a gradual decrease in in residential and total capita demand, <br />based on water usage data. <br />A. Triggers for Allocation and Demand Reduction Actions <br />Complete table 22 by checking each trigger below, as appropriate, and the actions to be taken at various <br />levels or stages of severity. Add in additional rows to the table as needed. <br />30 <br />