Laserfiche WebLink
111 Robinson Drive <br />Lino Lakes, MN 55014 <br />October 28, 2018 <br /> <br /> <br />Members of the Planning and Zoning Board <br />City of Lino Lakes <br />600 Town Center Parkway <br />Lino Lakes, MN 55014 <br /> <br /> <br />Dear Planning and Zoning Board Members, <br /> <br />We are writing to share with you an issue that came to our attention regarding our driveway at 111 <br />Robinson Drive, and to express our desire to obtain a variance. <br /> <br />We purchased our home, built by Capstone Homes of Ramsey, MN, on March 23, 2018. Due to our <br />home being built over the winter season, our driveway was installed by Capstone’s subcontractor, C&S <br />Blacktopping of Rogers, MN, on July 10, 2018. <br /> <br />Subsequent to moving in last March, but prior to the driveway being installed in July, one of Capstone’s <br />repairmen mentioned to us at our home that if we desired to have our driveway installed from the third <br />stall straight down to the street (rather than at an angle as standard), we could contact C&S <br />Blacktopping directly to get a price and have the change made when they came through to complete <br />that work for Capstone. We had chosen to forego this during the purchase process during the fall of <br />2017, as we were expecting our first child in addition to the expenses of our upcoming move. However, <br />when Capstone mentioned this was still an option after we had moved in, and we realized we could <br />afford to do so, we contacted C&S Blacktopping and agreed to pay an extra $1,000 for the driveway to <br />extend straight down the East side of the driveway from our third stall, which was how it was installed in <br />July. <br /> <br />On October 10, we received a brief email from Capstone informing us that the driveway had been <br />installed incorrectly per city code, and that they would be coming through that same week to cut away <br />the excess and replace it with sod in order to comply with the code. While not the fault of the city, this <br />notice was both confusing and unapologetic, while also giving us little to no opportunity to respond <br />timewise. <br /> <br />Our driveway measures approximately 27’ wide, while we have come to understand that the maximum <br />per city code is 26’. It was extremely disappointing for us to find out the approximately 1’ of the width of <br />our driveway, for approximately 15’ deep, would be required to be trimmed away per this code. <br />Although a small cut, it feels like a waste of $1,000 we spent, at Capstone’s suggestion, to have a <br />driveway at a uniform width with straight edges. Apparently we erred in trusting that our builder <br />Capstone and their subcontractor were fully aware of and complying with city code. <br /> <br />We felt pressured by Capstone by indicating that they were coming to cut our driveway that same week; <br />additionally, when we reached out to the city, we did not feel encouraged by the variance process due <br />both to the cost (up to $950) and the fact that staff would not recommend the variance to the Planning <br />& Zoning Board or the City Council. Therefore, we wrote the Mayor, City Administrator, and City Council,