My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Search
08-11-2003 EDA Packet
LinoLakes
>
City Council
>
Economic Development Authority (EDA)
>
Packets
>
2003
>
08-11-2003 EDA Packet
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
9/25/2019 11:01:00 AM
Creation date
3/21/2019 11:33:02 AM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
EDA
EDA Document Type
EDA Packet
Meeting Date
08/11/2003
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
51
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
Show annotations
View images
View plain text
EDA MINUTES JUNE 23, 2003 <br />DRAFT <br />134 <br />135 EDA Member Dahl asked if the language could say the business can move but they are still <br />136 responsible for the subsidy. EDA Member Dahl stated it seems like they are letting the business go if <br />137 they say they cannot pay and they want to leave. Ms. Divine indicated that the city does not continue <br />138 to pay a subsidy after the business has left. Ms. Divine indicated the City could find the business in <br />139 default of its agreement if the business left the city. <br />140 <br />141 EDA Member Reinert commented that this change is an option for the EDA, not a loophole for <br />142 businesses. He noted the EDA would have to release the business from their obligation, and at that <br />143 time the EDA could put a stipulation on the release. Ms. Divine suggested that in the Development <br />144 Agreement they could put such a stipulation. She noted this is general criteria of what is allowed by <br />145 statute. <br />146 <br />147 EDA Member Bergeson stated he would speak in favor of leaving the language as drafted, since it <br />148 mirrors what is in the law, and there may be cases where the City would want to allow movement. <br />149 For instance, if there is a small business on a large parcel that would be better suited for the <br />150 community with a different use; the City may want the option to allow the business to move. <br />151 <br />152 EDA Member O'Donnell concurred, noting this allows the City flexibility. <br />153 <br />154 Motion carried. EDA President Carlson opposed. <br />155 <br />156 CONSIDERATION OF RESOLUTION 03-02, EXTENDING THE COMPLIANCE DATE <br />157 FOR THE WAGE AND JOB GOALS FOR MARMON/KEYSTONE <br />158 <br />159 Ms. Divine summarized her report, indicating the EDA may, after a public hearing, extend the <br />160 compliance date by up to one year, as requested. If Marmon/Keystone is not given an extension, the <br />161 tax increment financing would be withheld according to a formula that is based on a pro rata share of <br />162 the number of jobs created versus the number required. <br />163 <br />164 EDA Member Dahl asked how many extensions are allowed if the goal is not met by June 1, 2004. <br />165 Ms. Divine stated this is the only extension that could be granted. She indicated if the goal is not met <br />166 by then, the Development Agreement states options the EDA could take at that time. <br />167 <br />168 EDA Member Dahl asked if Marmon/Keystone is aware they would be saving themselves $175,000 if <br />169 they met the goal. Ms. Divine indicated she has had that discussion with them. <br />170 <br />171 EDA Member Reinert moved to open the public hearing at 6:37 p.m. EDA Member O'Donnell <br />172 seconded the motion. Motion carried unanimously. <br />173 <br />174 EDA Member Dahl moved to close the public hearing at 6:37 p.m. EDA Member O'Donnell <br />175 seconded the motion. Motion carried unanimously. <br />176 <br />4 <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.