My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Search
1981-056U Council Ordinances
LinoLakes
>
City Council
>
City Council Ordinances
>
1981
>
1981-056U Council Ordinances
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
9/24/2019 11:18:01 AM
Creation date
3/29/2019 10:15:04 AM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
City Council
Council Document Type
Ordinances
Meeting Date
03/23/1981
Council Meeting Type
Regular
Ordinance #
56U
Ordinance Title
Amending Ordinance No. 6, by Rezoning Certain Real Estate to Light Industrial (Rehbein)
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
51
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
View images
View plain text
March' 23, 1981 <br />Pa.ge Three - <br />Mr. Schumacher presented the petition as it had been presented to the Planning <br />and Zoning Board. The Planning and Zoning Board had recommended a Public <br />Hearing be set for the consideration of the property designated as LI but had <br />e"le no recommendations in reference to the proposed area for HI. <br />Mr. Schumacher reported on the letter received from Mr. Short bascially <br />noting that this is a proper use for this parcel of land. Mr. Short also <br />suggested that the entire parcel be zoned LI until such time as Mr. Rehbein <br />has a specific proposal for HI. This use is consistent with the Comprehensive <br />Plan. <br />Mr. Schumacher presented some of the LI uses that are allowed per Ordinance <br />#56. The Engineer's letter was read noting there would be limitations on <br />the street construction and the septic system installation due to high water <br />table. However, it was noted this area is scheduled for sewers sometime <br />between 1981/1990. The street specifications were noted in this letter also. <br />There is an additional letter from Mr. Short but this deals with the re- <br />quirements for the platting and Mr. Schumacher that is not appropriate at <br />this hearing since this hearing deals with the rezoning of the lands. <br />Mrs. Paul Reinhold had written a letter setting forth some points she felt <br />should be considered before this rezoning is approved. She indicated she <br />felt that this matter had received preliminary approval. Mayor Gourley -said <br />there has not been any action with the exception of recommending that a"public <br />hearing be set. There has not been any preliminary approval of any sort. <br />The purpose of this hearing is to approve or disapprove the rezoning of the <br />lands - then the plat will need to go through the Planning and Zoning Board <br />aommk the Council. Mrs. Reinhold's concerns with screeing, etc. will be con- <br />s ered at that time. <br />Mr. Harvey Karth, representing Mr. Glenn Rehbein, stated that they are not <br />concerned with the HI area - this can either be rezoned to LI or left as- is. <br />Mr. Karth pointed out that at the present time, they do not plan to develop <br />the lands North of the ditch, nor do they plan to install a street on the <br />South of the Skelly Station. There are several other items that will be <br />discussed in more detail when the plat is presented. <br />Mr. Bill Bohjanen asked how big an area is being considered? Mayor Gourley <br />noted the area and that it contains 55 acres. <br />Tyr:. Bouvier , 7841 Lake Drive, School property to the West? Yes. Wondered <br />what kind of problems would this plat present if a school is developed- at <br />that location. Mayor Gourley said those kinds of concerns would be addressed <br />at the time of platting. <br />Mr. Karth said he had a list of concerns that had been presented by some of <br />the property owners along Lake Drive and these concerns will be taken into <br />consideration at the time of platting. <br />A resident asked if there had been any consideration of what this would do <br />to property values - wouldn't this devalue thepropertyexisting? <br />N �r Gourley said no such study had been done but he felt with the coming <br />of the sewer the property values would increase. <br />This person said that from what he had heard at this meeting, he would <br />object to this rezoning. Mayor Gourley asked if he had any specifics and <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.