Laserfiche WebLink
<br />WS – 8 <br />WORK SESSION STAFF REPORT <br />Work Session Item No. 8 <br /> <br /> <br />Date: June 3, 2019 <br /> <br />To: City Council <br /> <br />From: Karissa Bartholomew, Human Resources Manager <br /> <br />Re: Job Classification and Compensation Study <br /> <br /> <br />Background <br /> <br />In December 2018, the Council was made aware of the City’s issues with pay equity <br />compliance, which is a result of discrepancies in the City’s job classification system and <br />compensation plan. Last year’s compliance was only achieved by a pay increase to a <br />female position. <br /> <br />The City’s job classification system assigns each position points based on job duties and <br />technical skills. When job points do not correspond with the expected pay, any variance <br />creates a domino effect within the compensation plan. Currently, several positions are <br />above or below market. Based on what we are being told by consultants and Minnesota <br />Management & Budget that oversees pay equity, making adjustments to select positions <br />will no longer suffice. <br /> <br />Recommendation <br /> <br />Staff is recommending the City perform a comprehensive classification and compensation <br />study on all City positions in 2019 to redress internal equity issues and to ensure <br />compliance with pay equity. Below are two options for the Council to consider. <br /> <br />1. Bring in a compensation consultant. The obvious advantage is that the study would <br />demonstrate credibility, neutrality, and objectivity. A complete classification and <br />compensation study would cost the City $30,000. However, the cost can be <br />significantly reduced by having staff work with the consultant. Staff received a quote <br />from Keystone Consulting to perform this study at a reduced cost of $10,500. <br /> <br />2. The compensation study could be performed in-house; however, the current <br />benchmarking methodology would need to be abandoned. This would require access <br />to the Hay job evaluation system database, which is proprietary and would cost $6,000. <br />Unless the Council is committed to an annual fee for continued access, staff does not <br />recommend the Hay evaluation system. <br /> <br />Unlike Hay, Keystone uses its own job evaluation system. Once the compensation study <br />is completed, the City has full access to Keystone’s evaluation system, which would save <br />the City money in the long run.