Laserfiche WebLink
September 5, 1979 <br />The special meeting of the Planning and Zoning Commission was called to <br />order at 8:15 p.m., September 5, 1979 by Chairman Ken Gourley. Members <br />present: Bob Doocey, Jerome Heath, and Lawrence Johnson. Members absent: <br />James Shearen, Vernon Reinert, Vi Schwenk! and Council Liaison John McLean. <br />Also present were Mr. Short, City Planner, and his associate, Kevin Locke; <br />Mr. Gotwald, City Engineer; and Mayor Karth. <br />Mr. Gourley noted that the purpose of the meeting was to discuss land use <br />in general, and some of the motivating factors behind using it in particular <br />ways. The meeting was turned over to Mr. Short for his presentation. <br />Mr. Short reviewed the Comprehensive Plan process, of'which updating the <br />existing land use plan was an important part. There were a certain number of <br />requirements which Metro Council had stipulated that were not covered in the <br />existing plan, which would need to be added. For purposes of general dis <br />cussion, he had broken down land use into three major categories; commercial, <br />industrial, and residential. With the discussion and input from this meeting <br />he would be drafting a land use plan, which would be presented to the P & Z <br />on October 26; any decisions or comments at that time would be incorporated <br />into the final draft for adoption. The subsequent phases would be the study <br />of public facilities --parks, sewers and thoroughfares. The last phase of the <br />Comprehensive Plan, the implementation phase, would include a housing implemen- <br />tation plan, a capital improvements plan and revisions of the City existing <br />ordinances to reflect the decisions made in the land use plan. This would <br />address density, a zoning district map, a budget for improvement for roads, <br />parks and sewers, and so forth. Mr. Short had a series of drawings prepared <br />which were consulted and used as illustrations throughout the discussions. <br />Mr. Short first addressed the circumstances affecting the land use and <br />development in Lino Lakes. The list of influences were: thoroughfares, <br />interchanges, regional parks, lakes wetlands --very severe soils, and ex- <br />isting development patterns. The number of lakes and wetlands were a sig- <br />nificant factor as related to building on -site sewer systems and foundations <br />for structures. Together the lakes and wetlands, parks, and the interstate <br />highways cut through the City in a diagonal, basically dividing the City into <br />two geographical parts (northwest/southeast) and acted as a barrier to <br />movement through the City, with the exceptions of Main Street and Birch Street. <br />Interchanges were important factors to development in suburbs; they were <br />access points for residents from local collector streets and neighborhoods <br />to the interstate highway and into the urban employment centers; they became <br />very important as growth centers or "nodes" with activity spreading outwards <br />from them. Presently there was more growth near the Lake Street-35W inter- <br />change than the Main Street-35E interchange. Centerville could also be <br />considered in relation to any land use planning. <br />Mr. Short reviewed the map from the Anoka County Soil Conservation Service, <br />which had been done before the soil survey was completed, summarizing in <br />color the areas that had limitations to development, ranging from slight to <br />very severe. The best Lino Lakes had in any amount was soil with moderate <br />limitations (yellow). There was a diagonal corridor of mariginal limitations <br />soils along old Highway 8, which was a factor in development there. The wet <br />areas in the northwest were all currently sodfarms, and would probably remain <br />that way for sometimes as there were very serious limitations for development <br />in that area. <br />