Laserfiche WebLink
Page 2 <br />Planning and Zoning Commission <br />October 10, 1979 <br />�? <br />be extended for Lino Lakes to be meaningfulii,n view of the layout of the city. The two <br />principal arterials or freeways, in addition to the good minor arterials, <br />served the purpose of, or substituted for the lack of intermediate arterials. <br />County roads were intended.to serve normally as collectors, and were on a <br />one -mile grid. Another criteria, land access, referred to the type of land, <br />immediately adjacent .to the thoroughfare; for example, land along,the free- <br />way would not have access to it other than through the whole system of road- <br />ways. This became meaningful when reviewing subdivisions, asin the case of <br />areas adjacent .to collectors or minor arterials,; where driveways should not <br />back right on to the thoroughfare for reasons of safety and :function .of the <br />roadway. It was preferable that they back on to local streets, which in <br />turn fed into the arterial or collector —Mr. Short indicated that local <br />streets would not be covered in depth as .it was difficult to plan these <br />on a city-wide. scale. Another criteria, right-of-ways, generally became <br />larger as the capacity of the roadway increased. Mr. Gotwald noted that ; <br />Anoka County;was asking developers to dedicate a full 150-ft right-of-way, , <br />and that the ,City had realized that developers who platted were being forced <br />to give the additional land, whereas his neighbor with meets and bounds <br />was boi.ng compensated for that additional land when the county made an <br />improvement. Mr. Gourley indicated that the Councilhad recently taken action <br />to not require that width any more, but to ;require a 100-ft setback from <br />centerline to insure that 'fire county could expand. Mr. Gotwald felt this <br />kind of situation could be handled with slope easements or ditch ease- <br />ments rather than the large right-of-way. Mayor Karth indicated that the <br />county had also requested 150 feet on Elm Street; the county's rationale <br />for this was discussed and generally felt to be insufficient. Mrs Short <br />noted that Elm St. was not even designated a collector in the Metro System, <br />although it was a minor arterial in the 1974 county plan. He noted the <br />county would be updating their system to be consistent with Metro, and :. <br />there were some adjustments that would have to be made between the city, <br />county and region. He recommended that in the meantime Elm Street be <br />classified as as collector. In answer to a question, Mr. Short indicated <br />that the city and county plans would not necessarily have to agree, but <br />hopefully would; otherwise they would have to be negotiated out. Metro's <br />major concern was principal and intermediate arterials, although they had <br />an interest in any conflict between communities and would try to resolve it. <br />Mr. Gotwald indicated that the City would be concerned with county desig- <br />nations <br />in cases where there was a direct impact on the local street system, <br />particularly where development occurred, and where the City would want <br />to limit the amount of acreage the county took in right-of-ways,ie., off <br />the tax rolls. Mayor Karth indicated that according to the County <br />Attorney's Office, there was no state statute which gave the county the <br />authori+ty to take the land without going through condemnation proceedings; <br />yet in this case the city would be liable rather than the county because it <br />was the city that was enforcing the demand. <br />Mr. Short reviewed someof the revisions to the 1974 plan. One,of the big- <br />gest changes was that Anoka County had proposed Main Street be a.principal <br />arterial, and that an: interchange occur between Main Street and 35-W. <br />That plan had since been dropped. Mr. Short recommended that Main Street be <br />classified as a minor arterial, which also had implications as far as the <br />collector service roads that had been proposed to serve the properties ad- <br />jacent to Main, and which would no longer be needed. Mr. Heath notedthis <br />had been intended to serve the airport, which was not going to be built. <br />Mr. Gotwald indicated that Main would have been constructed to freeway <br />standards, yet with access not quite as limited, such as Highway 61 and 65. <br />