8b
<br />Page 6
<br />Planning and Zoning Commission
<br />October 24, 1979
<br />not require parks, but estimated the need would grow in this area as Tots
<br />were subdivided. If areas turned out to.bu unresubdividable, residents
<br />would have created their own rural area, and the need for a park would
<br />become a low priority. Area 2, west of Lake. Drive and north of Main Street
<br />had some facilities at the elementary schooa., which was the only school with-
<br />in the city, that would fulfill some of the needs.of a community park., How-
<br />ever, this was a mile,or so away from some.ofi,he subdivisions, and as more
<br />subdivisions occurrred, there would be the need for a park. Mr. Short
<br />suggested that park land be taken if a;subdivision came in that was in a
<br />practical location for a park for this area. Mr. Heath felt two parks
<br />might be necessary because of lot spilits, and the duplexes along Lake Drive
<br />and the western end of the neighborhood, although these were in a high
<br />water table area. Mr. Locke indicated that according to the land: use plan,
<br />this would not happen, and Mr; Short felt the elementary school facilities
<br />plus the additional park would be adequate. Area 3 was rural residential
<br />but hadnot developed much, and was bounded by rural on the west and by in-
<br />dustry on the south. Mr. Heath noted that most of the lots were about one
<br />acre. Itrwas suggested that it would be logical when cash was taken in lieu
<br />of land in an area, that it be applied to acquisition or development of parks
<br />within that neighborhood. Mr. Zelinka noted it would be interesting, when
<br />the Park Board wanted more than ten percent of the land, if they could buy
<br />it at $1,500 an acre. Mr. Short felt this would not be reversible. Area 4,
<br />east of Lake Drive, south of Main, and north,of the interstate, would be
<br />served by Lino Park. Mr. Short felt there was no need for, an additional
<br />park in view of the amount of developable land, and also in view of the fact
<br />that it was' n' very far from City Hall Park, although Main Street would be-
<br />come more of a barrier as the city developed. Mr. Locke noted that all the
<br />park needs they.were pointing out were really only needs if the different
<br />sectors reached full development and the kind of density the land use plan
<br />called for. Also, in the rural residential sections, which were at a lower
<br />density than other parts of the city, the application of the standards was
<br />more lenient, and the providing of neighborhood parks was a lower priority
<br />than for the more intensively developed areas. Mr. Short noted that in con-
<br />sidering the expansion residential areas, which was development at a one
<br />acre density-, the city should plan for futuwe resubdivision. Area 5,.the
<br />Sunset Oaks and Airpark area, was discussed; the Airpark area was 5-acre
<br />lots held in joint ownership, but Mr. Gourley felt these couldbe resub-
<br />dividable because of the street which ran down the south side.. Mr. Zelinka
<br />indicated they were considering land for Sunset Oaks, the arrangement being
<br />one tot lot site equivalent to two acres, and the balance would be taken
<br />either as another community park or the possibility of another tot lot. The
<br />total park land was 22 acres, the two of whioh had been designated for ,theā¢
<br />tot lot (one acre plus equipment). The selection would probably be made
<br />next year,or the following year. Mr. Short felt that due to the shape of
<br />the neighborhood, the farther the park site wasilocated from the center,
<br />the less practical it became. He felt that if negotiation was still open,
<br />a more central location should be chosen, although the size was good. The
<br />need for a park in this area will be shown in the park pian, generally near
<br />Lilac Street, as this was the midpoint of the district. Area 6, south of.
<br />the interstate and west of Lake Drive had an existing park development --
<br />Sunrise Park-- which served the area well as far as a neighborhood park and
<br />community playfield functions. Mr. Short noted there was schood district
<br />property in the area, which was a possibility, as the farther from Sunrise
<br />park, the more it was necessary to provide something. Mr. Zelinka indicated
<br />
|