Laserfiche WebLink
8b <br />Page 6 <br />Planning and Zoning Commission <br />October 24, 1979 <br />not require parks, but estimated the need would grow in this area as Tots <br />were subdivided. If areas turned out to.bu unresubdividable, residents <br />would have created their own rural area, and the need for a park would <br />become a low priority. Area 2, west of Lake. Drive and north of Main Street <br />had some facilities at the elementary schooa., which was the only school with- <br />in the city, that would fulfill some of the needs.of a community park., How- <br />ever, this was a mile,or so away from some.ofi,he subdivisions, and as more <br />subdivisions occurrred, there would be the need for a park. Mr. Short <br />suggested that park land be taken if a;subdivision came in that was in a <br />practical location for a park for this area. Mr. Heath felt two parks <br />might be necessary because of lot spilits, and the duplexes along Lake Drive <br />and the western end of the neighborhood, although these were in a high <br />water table area. Mr. Locke indicated that according to the land: use plan, <br />this would not happen, and Mr; Short felt the elementary school facilities <br />plus the additional park would be adequate. Area 3 was rural residential <br />but hadnot developed much, and was bounded by rural on the west and by in- <br />dustry on the south. Mr. Heath noted that most of the lots were about one <br />acre. Itrwas suggested that it would be logical when cash was taken in lieu <br />of land in an area, that it be applied to acquisition or development of parks <br />within that neighborhood. Mr. Zelinka noted it would be interesting, when <br />the Park Board wanted more than ten percent of the land, if they could buy <br />it at $1,500 an acre. Mr. Short felt this would not be reversible. Area 4, <br />east of Lake Drive, south of Main, and north,of the interstate, would be <br />served by Lino Park. Mr. Short felt there was no need for, an additional <br />park in view of the amount of developable land, and also in view of the fact <br />that it was' n' very far from City Hall Park, although Main Street would be- <br />come more of a barrier as the city developed. Mr. Locke noted that all the <br />park needs they.were pointing out were really only needs if the different <br />sectors reached full development and the kind of density the land use plan <br />called for. Also, in the rural residential sections, which were at a lower <br />density than other parts of the city, the application of the standards was <br />more lenient, and the providing of neighborhood parks was a lower priority <br />than for the more intensively developed areas. Mr. Short noted that in con- <br />sidering the expansion residential areas, which was development at a one <br />acre density-, the city should plan for futuwe resubdivision. Area 5,.the <br />Sunset Oaks and Airpark area, was discussed; the Airpark area was 5-acre <br />lots held in joint ownership, but Mr. Gourley felt these couldbe resub- <br />dividable because of the street which ran down the south side.. Mr. Zelinka <br />indicated they were considering land for Sunset Oaks, the arrangement being <br />one tot lot site equivalent to two acres, and the balance would be taken <br />either as another community park or the possibility of another tot lot. The <br />total park land was 22 acres, the two of whioh had been designated for ,theā€¢ <br />tot lot (one acre plus equipment). The selection would probably be made <br />next year,or the following year. Mr. Short felt that due to the shape of <br />the neighborhood, the farther the park site wasilocated from the center, <br />the less practical it became. He felt that if negotiation was still open, <br />a more central location should be chosen, although the size was good. The <br />need for a park in this area will be shown in the park pian, generally near <br />Lilac Street, as this was the midpoint of the district. Area 6, south of. <br />the interstate and west of Lake Drive had an existing park development -- <br />Sunrise Park-- which served the area well as far as a neighborhood park and <br />community playfield functions. Mr. Short noted there was schood district <br />property in the area, which was a possibility, as the farther from Sunrise <br />park, the more it was necessary to provide something. Mr. Zelinka indicated <br />