My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Search
08-05-2019 Park Board Packet
LinoLakes
>
Advisory Boards & Commissions
>
Park Board
>
Park Board Meeting Packets
>
1999-2020 Park Board Packets
>
2019 Park Board Packets
>
08-05-2019 Park Board Packet
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
10/27/2023 7:22:16 PM
Creation date
8/2/2019 2:50:03 PM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
Park Board
Park Bd Document Type
Park Board Packet
Meeting Date
08/05/2019
Park Bd Meeting Type
Regular
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
43
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
View images
View plain text
DRAFT April 01 , 2019 <br /> Andrea Schmidt asked DeGardner if the proposed spot by the resident was a safe spot for <br /> residents to access the library and DeGardner responded that they were looking to place it <br /> closer to the Park so that the people would not be close to traffic . <br /> Gooder asked if the size was about the same as the other Little Free Libraries . DeGardner <br /> responded that he believed it was relatively the same size . DeGardner stated resident was <br /> not certain of the color of the library as of yet and stated that they would want to know <br /> and see the color prior to the full approval of the library but stated that he thought the <br /> resident has good intentions and a good plan in place for the library . DeGardner also <br /> stated that the resident was looking to have it installed sometime in June . <br /> Gooder inquired about whose land the library would be installed on and DeGardner <br /> responded that it would be on City property/Shenandoah Park property . <br /> Huelman stated that he thought the library would be a nice added benefit especially for <br /> parents who are watching their kids play they could grab a book and read a chapter . <br /> Andrea Schmidt stated that she thought it was a good idea as long as the maintenance and <br /> upkeep is done by the resident . <br /> Richard Jensen shared his concern about vandalism . Stated that although it was a concern <br /> they had good success with the other two and didn ' t see why this one wouldn ' t work . <br /> Andrea Schmidt pointed out the proposal addressed the ongoing maintenance and pointed <br /> out that the resident stated it would be the residents responsibility to maintain the library . <br /> She stated that the resident seemed to understands and take responsibility for the library <br /> and that she is ok with the library as long as it is far enough from the road . States she <br /> thinks this is really a nice and sweet idea. <br /> DeGardner did state that there is some uncertainties right now as the libraries are <br /> relatively new. One being how long they last depending on what they are built with. He <br /> stated that the library could last 3 , 5 , 7 years but will not know until further down the <br /> road whether there could be some light maintenance needed on them . <br /> Jenson stated that he agreed with Andrea that any maintenance needed would be the <br /> responsibility of the resident who put it up . DeGardner states that the City could certainly <br /> request that, however at the end of the day the structure is still on City property . He <br /> believes that the intent of the resident is to maintain the library but people move and <br /> such . He states that he is cautiously optimistic that this is something we should continue <br /> to support . <br /> Page 3 <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.