My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Search
04-01-2019 Park Board Minutes
LinoLakes
>
Advisory Boards & Commissions
>
Park Board
>
Park Board Meeting Minutes
>
2019 Minutes
>
04-01-2019 Park Board Minutes
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
10/24/2023 3:49:53 PM
Creation date
10/10/2019 2:03:38 PM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
Park Board
Park Bd Document Type
Park Board Minutes
Meeting Date
04/01/2019
Park Bd Meeting Type
Regular
Park Bd Publication Type
Other
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
7
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
View images
View plain text
Approved April 01, 2019 <br /> <br />Page 3 <br /> <br />Andrea Schmidt asked DeGardner if the proposed spot by the resident was a safe spot for <br />residents to access the library and DeGardner responded that they were looking to place it <br />closer to the Park so that the people would not be close to traffic. <br /> <br />Gooder asked if the size was about the same as the other Little Free Libraries. DeGardner <br />responded that he believed it was relatively the same size. DeGardner stated resident was <br />not certain of the color of the library as of yet and stated that they would want to know <br />and see the color prior to the full approval of the library but stated that he thought the <br />resident has good intentions and a good plan in place for the library. DeGardner also <br />stated that the resident was looking to have it installed sometime in June. <br /> <br />Gooder inquired about whose land the library would be installed on and DeGardner <br />responded that it would be on City property/Shenandoah Park property. <br /> <br />Huelman stated that he thought the library would be a nice added benefit especially for <br />parents who are watching their kids play they could grab a book and read a chapter. <br /> <br /> Andrea Schmidt stated that she thought it was a good idea as long as the maintenance and <br />upkeep is done by the resident. <br /> <br /> Richard Jensen shared his concern about vandalism. Stated that although it was a concern <br />they had good success with the other two and didn’t see why this one wouldn’t work. <br /> <br /> Andrea Schmidt pointed out the proposal addressed the ongoing maintenance and pointed <br />out that the resident stated it would be the residents responsibility to maintain the library. <br />She stated that the resident seemed to understands and take responsibility for the library <br />and that she is ok with the library as long as it is far enough from the road. States she <br />thinks this is really a nice and sweet idea. <br /> <br /> DeGardner did state that there is some uncertainties right now as the libraries are <br />relatively new. One being how long they last depending on what they are built with. He <br />stated that the library could last 3, 5, 7 years but will not know until further down the <br />road whether there could be some light maintenance needed on them. <br /> <br /> Jenson stated that he agreed with Andrea that any maintenance needed would be the <br />responsibility of the resident who put it up. DeGardner states that the City could certainly <br />request that, however at the end of the day the structure is still on City property. He <br />believes that the intent of the resident is to maintain the library but people move and <br />such. He states that he is cautiously optimistic that this is something we should continue <br />to support. <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.