My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Search
04-08-2019 Council Packet
LinoLakes
>
City Council
>
City Council Meeting Packets
>
1982-2020
>
2019
>
04-08-2019 Council Packet
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
10/30/2021 1:08:47 PM
Creation date
10/16/2019 11:52:51 AM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
City Council
Council Document Type
Council Packet
Meeting Date
04/08/2019
Council Meeting Type
Regular
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
193
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
View images
View plain text
Ms. Katie Larsen <br />03/29/2019 <br />Page 3 <br />Lyngblomsten Preliminary Plat Engineering Review <br /> <br />• Stormwater Management <br /> <br />The Lyngblomsten development is 20.74 acres in size, with an existing impervious area of <br />approximately 2 acres. Majority of the site runoff is towards the west where there is an 24 inch <br />diameter pipe outlet and to the existing wetland on site. The proposed impervious area is <br />approximately 9.5 acres. There is a proposed pond located in the middle and east side of the site. The <br />City adopts Rice Creek Watershed District’s (RCWD) rules for water quality and quantity requirements. <br />The applicant is proposing a stormwater reuse system that will be further reviewed with the final <br />design. It is strongly recommended that the applicant obtain an approved CAPROC prior to final plat <br />approval. <br />The current submittal now includes rate control via a combination of a dry pond (located in the <br />northwest) and a stormwater treatment pond. The submittal normal water level of the pond is 896, and <br />the 100 year elevation of the pond is at 900.5. <br /> <br />1. The applicant is not showing the existing impervious on Outlot C in the drainage <br />calculations and if it is the intent to redevelop with this area being impervious the <br />applicant would need to revise the proposed drainage map, HydroCAD model and water <br />quality calculations to include this area. Otherwise in the future this area will be required <br />to meet RCWD rule C and City stormwater requirements. <br />Drainage calculations and spreadsheets now account for Outlot C. Genetically, the area <br />has been set to mostly impervious to allow for flexibility in future planning <br />2. In the Stormwater report, the applicant should include a summary table of the HWLs (2, <br />10, and 100-year) for the wetland (both existing and proposed) and in the proposed <br />pond. Indicate on the summery the lowest adjacent building opening elevation. <br />a. The applicant shall also verify free board requirements are met. <br />The summary table has been modified. <br />3. It is not clear on the plans where the Porous Baffle Basin and Floating Head Skimmer <br />are proposed. The applicant shall submit additional information for review. <br />The plans have been modified to show the location of erosion control devices. See <br />sheets C1.50-CI .52. <br />These erosion control devices will be reviewed with the final design submittal. <br />4. In the plan and modeling, the applicant shall update the NWL of the pond to be at, or <br />above, the elevation of 897.0. This is the conservative estimated seasonal ground water <br />elevation provided by Braun in the Geotechnical Report. <br />a. The applicant shall also verify all HWL and freeboard requirements are still met. <br />The normal water level lies been adjusted <br />The City is comfortable allowing the NWL of the pond to be constructed below the ground <br />water elevation if the pond is lined with a 1.0-foot clay liner. Please provide an updated plan, <br />HydroCAD model/discharge rate calculations, water quality calculations, and irrigation <br />calculations. <br /> <br />5. The City’s standard outlet control structure shall be used without a Fluidic-AMP <br />Hydrobrake. The HydroCAD model shall reflect this. <br />The fluidic amp Hydrobrake has been included in the model to allow for Rice Creek <br />Watershed District’s required 80% reduction inflow rate. If a standard orifice where to be <br />used, it would be small enough where we are concerned about clogging of the actual <br />orifice. The Hydrobrake provides a reduced flow yet allows for the passing of a larger <br />sphere. The model has not been updated. <br />The applicant has communicated to us that this outlet has been changed and modified <br />to be a v notch weir with a 10 inch orifice at outlet. <br /> <br />6. In the HydroCAD models, <br />a. The applicant shall use a MSE3 rainfall distribution instead of the Type II. <br />The MSE3 distribution has been used.
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.