06-24-2019 Council Packet - Laserfiche WebLink

Home Search

COUNCIL MINUTES June 10, 2019 DRAFT 3 There was no report from the Public Services Department. 90 91 COMMUNITY DEVELOPMENT DEPARTMENT REPORT 92 93 6A) Saddle Club Fourth Addition: i. Consider Resolution No. 19-63, Approving PUD Final 94 Plat; ii. Consider Resolution No. 19-63, Approving PUD Final Plan/Final Plat – City Planner 95 Larsen reviewed a PowerPoint presentation including information on: 96 - Developer and proposed general plans; 97 - Map of location; 98 - Previous council actions (rezoning, 99 - Final plat approval is being requested; 100 - Transportation and Utility Connection; 101 - Park dedication fees; 102 - Planning & Zoning Board recommendation to approve. 103 104 Council Member Stoesz asked where the wetland bank credits are coming from. Staff indicated a 105 location outside of the City and provided an explanation of the wetland bank process. 106 Council Member Manthey moved to approve Resolution No. 19-48 as presented. Council Member 107 Rafferty seconded the motion. Motion carried on a voice vote. 108 Council Member Manthey moved to approve Resolution No. 19-48 as presented. Council Member 109 Rafferty seconded the motion. Motion carried on a voice vote. 110 6B) Consider Resolution No. 19-67, Ordering Project, Approving Plans and Specifications and 111 Authorizing Advertisement for Bids, for the East Cedar Street & 24th Avenue/Elmcrest Avenue 112 North Improvement Project – WSB & Associaties representative Brian Bourassa reviewed the 113 request for approval of actions to move forward on these road projects. He reviewed the areas included 114 in the project. Some financial responsibility for the project will be covered by the City of Hugo since 115 the project area includes both cities. He explained the planned bidding process that should get the best 116 result. 117 Mayor Reinert remarked that this project will impact a couple of streets that really need work. In the 118 case of Elmcrest, the roadway runs through two cities and two counties; teaming up with Hugo is a 119 good way to address the needed work. The City has worked with Hugo on getting Cedar done as well. 120 The result is a sharing of costs. 121 122 Council Member Rafferty extended thanks to staff and the engineers of the City of Hugo for working 123 out a good project. 124 125 Council Member Maher moved to approve Resolution No. 19-67 as presented. Council Member 126 Rafferty seconded the motion. Motion carried on a voice vote. 127 128 6C) Consider Resolution 19-71, Accepting Quotes and Awarding a Construction Contract 129 for Well No. 7 (Screened Test Well) - Community Development Director Grochala reviewed staff’s 130 request to receive a quote and award a construction contract for this well project. The council was 131