My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Search
07-08-2019 Council Packet
LinoLakes
>
City Council
>
City Council Meeting Packets
>
1982-2020
>
2019
>
07-08-2019 Council Packet
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
10/30/2021 1:08:48 PM
Creation date
10/16/2019 12:15:38 PM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
City Council
Council Document Type
Council Packet
Meeting Date
07/08/2019
Council Meeting Type
Regular
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
120
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
View images
View plain text
2 <br /> <br />Per the applicant’s narrative, the closing date to purchase the home was on November 15, 2018 <br />and it was too late in the year to have the driveway replaced (Attachment #2). A temporary <br />certificate of occupancy was issued on November 13, 2018 and a $1,000 escrow was collected <br />from the property owner until the driveway issue is resolved. <br /> <br />The parcel is a 16,139 sf corner lot on a platted cul de sac. The paved road and curb are <br />approximately 60 feet from the lot line (aka right-of-way line). The existing driveway is 34 feet <br />wide at the property line and tapers to 20 feet at the curb. The ordinance allows for a 26 foot <br />wide driveway from the property line to the curb. The applicant states in their narrative several <br />reasons why it is hard to comply with the ordinance due to the distance from the curb to the <br />property line. Staff will note that platted cul duc sacs and 4 stall garages are not unique <br />(Attachment #6). The distance from the curb to the property line is not relevant and the <br />Certificate of Survey submitted with the building permit showed that a compliant driveway is <br />possible. A 26 foot wide driveway from the curb to the property line is feasible and would be <br />compliant. <br /> <br />The property is zoned R-1, Single Family Residential and is located in an urban residential <br />subdivision. The City Engineer does not approve widening of the curb cut. The property <br />owners would be required to cut out an 8 foot wide section of the driveway. They are <br />requesting a variance instead of having to cut out a section of the driveway. <br /> <br />Zoning Ordinance <br /> <br />Per Section 1007.044(3)(h): <br /> <br />7. Curb Cut/Driveway Width. No curb cut shall exceed twenty-six (26) feet in width <br />within a residential zoning district, or thirty-six (36) feet in width if the property is in a <br />commercial, industrial, or public/semi-public zoning district, as measured at the street right-of- <br />way line unless approved by the City Engineer. The driveway associated with such curb cut <br />may increase in width at an angle not greater than forty-five (45) degrees. <br /> <br />At the March 5, 2018 Council Work Session, staff presented a report regarding driveway <br />widths. The staff report detailed that driveway width restrictions are fairly common and serve a <br />number of purposes. These include: <br /> <br />• Maintain front yard green space and enhance the streetscape. <br />• Preserve areas for on-street parking. <br />• Minimize impact and maintenance costs to public right-of-way and utility corridors. <br />• Preserve street snow storage. <br />• Minimize conflicts with vehicle, pedestrian and bicycles using street. <br />• Minimize impervious surfaces. <br /> <br />The Council concurred that the current regulations are fine and the ordinance was not amended <br />to allow for wider driveways. <br /> <br />Attachment #5 is a Driveway Exhibit depicting a 26 foot wide curb cut and 45 degree angle. <br /> <br />Findings of Fact
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.