Laserfiche WebLink
3 <br /> <br />resources. The responsibility for the management of shoreland areas is hereby recognized by <br />the city. <br /> <br />Section 1102.03 Definitions. SHORELAND. Land located within 1,000 feet from the ordinary <br />high water level of the lakes and land located within 300 feet from the streams classified in <br />§ 1102.05 or the landward extent of a flood plain designated by ordinance on a river or stream, <br />whichever is greater. The limits of shorelands may be reduced whenever the waters involved <br />are bounded by topographic divides which extend landward from the waters for lesser distances <br />and when approved by the Commissioner. <br /> <br />Section 1102.07(1)(c)4. Impervious surface coverage of lots must not exceed the following <br />percentages of lot area: <br /> <br /> NE RD GD R <br />Single-family 30% 30% 30% 30% <br />Two-family/duplex 30% 30% 30% 30% <br />Triplex/quad/townhomes 35% 35% 35% 35% <br />Commercial/industrial 60% 60% 60% 60% <br /> <br />The subject site, 6650 Enid Trail, is a single-family lot located within the shoreland overlay of <br />Rice Lake which is classified as a Natural Environment (NE) lake. Therefore, the maximum <br />allowed impervious surface is 30%. It should be noted that even if this lot were not in the <br />shoreland overlay district, the standard R-1 allowed impervious surface coverage is only 40%. <br />The proposed house plan with 43.7% impervious would not meet either of these minimum <br />requirements. <br /> <br />As explained in the MNDNR Shoreland & Floodplain Variance Guidance handout (Attachment <br />#6), in the protection of water quality, the management of rainwater on individual lots is one of <br />our most important tasks. As impervious surface coverage increases, the rate and amount of <br />runoff and pollutants entering the public waters increases. The handout also details <br />“Considerations for Findings”, “Range of Outcomes” and “Conditions on Variances”. <br /> <br />Applicant’s Narrative <br /> <br />See Attachment #3 for the Applicant’s Narrative. The following summarizes the applicant’s <br />variance arguments followed by City’s response in italics. <br /> <br />1. The lot is irregular with an atypically long driveway. <br /> <br />The lot is a standard 80’ wide x 135’ deep R-1 lot. The applicant chose to “flip” the house and <br />relocate the driveway to the north causing it to be longer and larger. <br /> <br />2. The applicant proposes a rain garden/infiltration basin in the rear yard, gutter and <br />downspouts and side yard swale. <br /> <br />Reasonable conditions such as rain gardens, porous pavers or downspouts could be required <br />only if all variance criteria are met. As detailed below, these variance criteria are not met.