Laserfiche WebLink
<br /> Anoka County 2019 <br />Multi-Jurisdictional <br />All Hazards Mitigation Plan <br /> <br />129 <br />54B4.4.5 Tier II Hazardous Materials Assessment <br />On October 17, 1986, in response to a growing concern for safety around chemical facilities, <br />Congress enacted the Emergency Planning and Community Right-to-Know Act (EPCRA), also <br />known as Title III of the Superfund Amendments and Reauthorization Act (SARA). The Act has <br />a far-reaching influence on hazardous materials issues. EPCRA contains five sections covering <br />issues associated with the manufacture, use, exposure, transportation, and public education of <br />hazardous materials. It is the mission of the Local Emergency Planning Committees (LEPCs) <br />and State Emergency Response Commission (SERC) to implement EPCRA in the State of <br />Minnesota and mitigate the effects of a release or spill of hazardous materials. <br /> <br />The State Emergency Response Commission is responsible for implementing federal EPCRA <br />provisions in Minnesota and serving as a technical advisor and information clearinghouse for <br />state and federal hazardous materials programs. The Minnesota Homeland Security and <br />Emergency Management is the lead agency responsible for implementing EPCRA and provides <br />administrative functions and support to the SERC. The Commission conducts quarterly public <br />meetings in varying locations throughout the state. Currently, SERC membership is comprised <br />of Governor-appointed individuals who represent the interests of state and local government, <br />emergency services, industry, and the environment. <br /> <br />55B4.4.6 Terrorism Vulnerability <br />Hostile attack is the most threatening manmade hazard that could affect Anoka County. There is <br />no history of hostile attacks; however, the potential exists. The most dangerous variants of <br />terrorism - nuclear, biological, or chemical attacks could affect Anoka County. The probability is <br />relatively low. At present, the most likely form of nuclear, biological, or chemical terrorism may <br />be a threat or hoax of a chemical device or sabotage. <br /> <br />With the mobility of the world’s population and the possibility of a terrorist attack, it is possible to <br />have a major disease outbreak or nerve gas release anywhere in the US, including Anoka <br />County. It is impossible to assess Anoka County’s vulnerability to international terrorism. <br />Although extremist groups exist within the state, it is unlikely that any terrorist act perpetrated by <br />these groups would be disastrous statewide. Authorities on terrorism generally agree that <br />terrorism cannot be wiped out entirely. For the present, it is a problem to be managed, not <br />solved. Efforts to manage political terrorism in Anoka County should include: <br />• Gathering intelligence on terrorist operations, members and their ideology. <br />• Pooling intelligence and information with knowledgeable sources. <br />• Physically protecting suspected targets. <br />• Promoting public awareness. <br />• Controlling arms and explosives. <br />• Improving screening of applicants for jobs requiring use of arms and explosives. <br />• Preparing contingency plans for different kinds of terrorist acts. <br /> <br />