My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Search
08-12-2019 Council Packet
LinoLakes
>
City Council
>
City Council Meeting Packets
>
1982-2020
>
2019
>
08-12-2019 Council Packet
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
10/30/2021 1:08:48 PM
Creation date
10/16/2019 3:45:42 PM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
City Council
Council Document Type
Council Packet
Meeting Date
08/12/2019
Council Meeting Type
Regular
Jump to thumbnail
< previous set
next set >
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
565
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
View images
View plain text
<br /> Anoka County 2019 <br />Multi-Jurisdictional <br />All Hazards Mitigation Plan <br /> <br />155 <br />4BSECTION 5: CAPABILITIES, MITIGATION AND MAINTENANCE <br /> <br /> <br />31B5.1 Jurisdiction Capabilities <br />This section of the Plan discusses the capability of Anoka County and the participating local <br />jurisdictions to implement hazard mitigation actions. It consists of the following eight <br />subsections: <br />Capability Assessment Overview <br />Conducting the Capability Assessment <br />Capability Assessment Findings <br />External Resources <br />Disaster Shelters <br />Previously Implemented Mitigation Measures <br />Repetitive Flooding Mitigation <br />Linking Capability Assessment, Risk Assessment, and Mitigation Strategy <br /> <br /> <br />57B5.1.1 Capability Assessment Overview <br />The purpose of conducting a capability assessment is to determine the ability of a local <br />jurisdiction to implement a comprehensive mitigation strategy, and to identify potential <br />opportunities for establishing or enhancing specific mitigation policies, programs, or projects. As <br />in any planning process, it is important to try to establish goals, objectives and actions that are <br />feasible, based on an understanding of the organizational capacity of those agencies or <br />departments tasked with their implementation. A capability assessment helps determine which <br />mitigation actions are practical and likely to be implemented given a local government’s <br />regulatory framework, level of administrative and technical support, and fiscal resources. <br /> <br />A capability assessment has two primary components: an inventory of a local jurisdiction’s <br />relevant plans, ordinances, or programs already in place, and an analysis of its capacity to carry <br />them out. A capability assessment also highlights the positive mitigation measures already in <br />place or being implemented at the local level, which should continue to be supported and <br />enhanced through future mitigation efforts. The capability assessment completed for Anoka <br />County and its jurisdictions serves as a critical planning step and is an integral part of the <br />foundation for designing an effective multi-jurisdictional hazard mitigation strategy. Coupled with <br />the Risk Assessment, the Capability Assessment helps identify and target meaningful mitigation <br />actions for incorporation in the Mitigation Strategy section of the Hazard Mitigation Plan. It not <br />only helps establish the goals and objectives for Anoka County, but also ensures that those <br />goals and objectives are realistically achievable under given local conditions. <br /> <br /> <br />58B5.1.2 Conducting the Capability Assessment <br />In order to facilitate the inventory and analysis of local government capabilities throughout <br />Anoka County, a Capability Assessment Survey was distributed to Anoka County and its <br />municipalities. The survey was completed by appropriate local government officials and <br />requested information on a variety of “capability indicators” such as existing local plans, policies, <br />programs, or ordinances that contribute to the community’s ability to implement hazard <br />mitigation actions. Other indicators requested included information related to each jurisdiction’s <br />fiscal, administrative, and technical capabilities, such as access to local budgetary and <br />personnel resources for mitigation purposes. At a minimum, survey results provide an extensive <br />inventory of existing local plans, ordinances, programs, and resources in place or under <br />development. The survey instrument thereby not only helps accurately assess each
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.