Laserfiche WebLink
<br /> Anoka County 2019 <br />Multi-Jurisdictional <br />All Hazards Mitigation Plan <br /> <br /> 168 <br /> <br />REPETITIVE FLOODING MITIGATION Number of Structures Structure Type <br />Residential <br />Commercial <br />Government <br />Critical Facility <br />Etc. <br />Flood <br />Location <br />Flood Type <br />Storm Water <br />Out of Banks <br />Low Lying <br />Maintenance Number of events Mitigation Action <br />Structure Buy Out <br />Levee Built <br />Drainage Improvement <br />Etc. <br />12 Residential Riverview Terrace, Fridley Out of Banks 4 Levee Built <br />44 Residential River Avenue, Anoka Out of Banks 7 Structure Buy Out <br /> <br /> <br />64B5.1.8 Linking Capability Assessments, Risk Assessment, and Mitigation Strategy <br />The findings of the Capability Assessment and Risk Assessment serve as the foundation for a <br />meaningful hazard mitigation strategy. During the process of identifying the goals, objectives <br />and mitigation actions, each jurisdiction must consider not only its level of hazard risk but also <br />its existing capability to minimize or eliminate that risk. <br /> <br />In jurisdictions where the overall hazard risk is considered to be HIGH, and local capability is <br />considered LOW, specific mitigation actions that account for these conditions should be <br />considered. This may include less costly actions such as minor ordinance revisions or public <br />awareness activities. Also, specific capabilities may need to be improved in order to address <br />recurring threats. <br /> <br />In cases where the hazard vulnerability is LOW and overall capability is HIGH, more emphasis <br />can be placed on actions that may impact future vulnerability such as guiding development <br />away from known hazard areas. <br /> <br /> <br />32B5.2 Mitigation Strategy <br /> <br />65B5.2.1 Overview <br />The intent of the Mitigation Strategy is to provide Anoka County and its municipal jurisdictions <br />with goals that will guide future mitigation policy and project administration, along with a list of <br />proposed actions deemed necessary to meet those goals and reduce the impact of natural and <br />manmade hazards. It is designed to be comprehensive and strategic in nature. <br /> <br />Development of the comprehensive strategy included a thorough review of all natural and <br />selected manmade hazards, and identification of policies and projects to reduce the future <br />impacts of hazards and assist the county and municipalities to achieve compatible economic, <br />environmental, and social goals. The strategy ensures that all policies and projects are linked to <br />established priorities and assigned to specific departments or individuals responsible for their <br />implementation with target implementation deadlines. When applicable, funding sources are <br />identified that can be used to assist in project implementation. <br /> <br />The first step in designing the Mitigation Strategy includes a review of existing mitigation <br />measures and the identification of countywide Mitigation Goals. Mitigation Goals represent <br />broad statements that are achieved through the implementation of more specific, action-oriented <br />objectives listed in the county’s Mitigation Action Plan. These actions include both hazard