My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Search
11-04-2019 Park Board Packet
LinoLakes
>
Advisory Boards & Commissions
>
Park Board
>
Park Board Meeting Packets
>
1999-2020 Park Board Packets
>
2019 Park Board Packets
>
11-04-2019 Park Board Packet
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
10/24/2023 2:00:40 PM
Creation date
11/1/2019 2:29:06 PM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
Park Board
Park Bd Document Type
Park Board Packet
Meeting Date
11/04/2019
Park Bd Meeting Type
Regular
Park Bd Publication Type
Other
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
17
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
View images
View plain text
Draft October 7, 2019 <br />Page 6 <br /> <br />DeGardner stated that sometimes lights have the opposite effect (meaning it draws more <br />unwanted night life in). <br /> <br />Pat Huelman, Park Board Chair, addressed the crowd of residents at the end of the <br />discussion. He thanked everyone for coming and told them it was fun and interesting to <br />hear from all of them. He stated that he knows there are some difference of opinions <br />perhaps, but it was still nice to see the neighborhood show up, get behind this, and put in <br />their thoughts. He stated often they (the Park Board) need to make decisions without a lot <br />of input so it was nice to have everyone’s input. <br /> <br />A resident asked the Park Board that if the Lyngblomsten development comes in, if there <br />would be a path from their development/houses that would go along Woodridge and into <br />“this” park (Woods of Baldwin Lake Park). Rick DeGardner, Director of Public Services, <br />stated “yes” as well as a trail on the north side of County Road J over to Hodgson. This <br />trail would be within the County Right of Way. He then clarified that the Lynbloomsten <br />trail would attach to Woodridge Lane. He stated that he foresees a lot of people using the <br />trail to get to the Lyngblomsten development rather than vice versa. <br /> <br />7. Parks Update: <br /> <br />A. Apollo Drive Trail <br /> Rick DeGardner, Director of Public Services updated the Park Board regarding Apollo <br />Trail. He said that as discussed during the August Park Board meeting, the City Council <br />recently approved funding for the construction of a pedestrian trail along Apollo Drive <br />between Lake Drive and Lilac Street. It was also mentioned that staff working with WSB <br />Engineering to prepare plans and specifications. The proposed design documents were <br />submitted to the Anoka County Highway Department for review/approval. Through the <br />review process, Anoka County identified that a north pedestrian crossing at Apollo Drive <br />intersection would require signal upgrades. In addition, the existing signals have obsolete <br />components requiring replacement. Anoka County is currently completing a feasibility <br />study evaluating the signals. Concurrently, the City solicited and received quotes for the <br />trail project (excluding signal work). Only one quote was received in the amount of <br />$235,000. This quote was substantially higher than the engineer’s estimate of $165,000. <br />Staff is recommending re-bidding the project once information about the signal is <br />received. The option to construct the trail on the south side of Apollo Drive may be <br />recommended pending signal upgrade costs. It is also recommended to obtain quotes <br />during a more favorable bid climate. DeGarnder stated that the project had run into a few <br />stumbling blocks and that he would keep the Park Board updated on the project. <br /> <br /> Andrew Levi, Park Board Member, stated that the Council dedicated money for this. He <br />questioned if this is something that the City should still move forward with. “Is this <br />something they still wanted to do?” he said. He stated he is asking this because it would <br />just be that connection to Lilac. He stated it sounded like the main trail on Lilac wasn’t <br />going to happen due to easement cost and everything else and if this is going to cost over
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.