|
CITY OF LINO LAKES
<br />RESOLUTION NO. 19-177
<br />RESOLUTION ESTABLISHING 2020
<br />COMPENSATION PLAN FOR NON -UNION EMPLOYEES
<br />WHEREAS, Section 207.04 of the Code of Ordinances requires the City Administrator to
<br />establish and maintain a compensation plan for all positions in the City, which is to be reviewed
<br />and approved by the City Council; and
<br />WHEREAS, this plan is in compliance with Minnesota Statute 471, which is referred to as the
<br />Pay Equity Law; and
<br />WHEREAS, the compensation plan includes a three percent (3%) wage increase, effective
<br />January 1, 2020.
<br />NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED by the City Council of the City of Lino Lakes that
<br />the following salary schedule be adopted.
<br />City of Lino Lakes 2020 Compensation Plan
<br />Effective January 1, 2020
<br />Position '
<br />Minimum
<br />Monthly
<br />Step 2
<br />Step 3
<br />Step 4
<br />Step 5
<br />Maximum
<br />Monthly
<br />City Administrator
<br />$10,217
<br />$10,728
<br />$11,238
<br />$11,749
<br />$12,260
<br />$12,771
<br />Public Safety Director
<br />$8,992
<br />$9,442
<br />$9,892
<br />$10,341
<br />$10,791
<br />$11,240
<br />Finance Director
<br />$8,445
<br />$8,867 _
<br />$9,290
<br />$9,712
<br />$10,134
<br />$10,556
<br />Comm. Dev. Director
<br />$8,376
<br />$8,795
<br />$9,214
<br />$9,632
<br />$10,051
<br />$10,470
<br />Public Serv. Director
<br />$8,350
<br />$8,767
<br />$9,185
<br />$9,602
<br />$10,020
<br />$10,437
<br />Dep. Public Safety Dir.
<br />$7,877
<br />$8,270
<br />$8,664
<br />$9,058
<br />$9,452
<br />$9,846
<br />Public Safety Captain
<br />$7,362
<br />$7,730
<br />$8,098
<br />$8,466
<br />$8,834
<br />$9,202
<br />HR Manager
<br />$6,748
<br />$7,085
<br />$7,423
<br />$7,760
<br />$8,097
<br />$8,435
<br />City Clerk
<br />$5,542
<br />$5,819
<br />$6,096
<br />$6,374
<br />$6,651
<br />$6,928
<br />Adopted by the Lino Lakes City Council this 23`d day of December 2019.
<br />The motion for the adoption of the foregoing resolution was introduced by Council Member
<br />Stoesz and was duly seconded by Council Member Maher and upon vote being
<br />taken thereon, the following voted in favor thereof:
<br />Stoesz, Maher, Manthey, Rafferty,
<br />The following voted against same:
<br />none
<br />ATTEST:
<br />
|