11-12-2019 Council Packet - Laserfiche WebLink

Home Search

3 4. The plight of the landowner shall be due to circumstances unique to the property not created by the landowner. The plight of the landowner is due to circumstances unique to the property and was not created by the landowner. The applicant is proposing to subdivide an existing lot of record platted in 1982 prior to the City’s 1995 adoption of the shoreland management ordinance. 5. The variance shall not alter the essential character of the locality and is consistent with development of adjacent properties. The variance will not alter the essential character of the locality. Riparian development adjacent to Reshanau Lake includes low density single family lots. Many of these smaller lots were platted between 1969 and 1991. 6. A variance shall not be granted for any use that is not allowed under the ordinance for property in the zoning district where the subject site is located. Single family detached dwellings are allowed as Permitted Uses in the R-1X, Single Family Executive Residential District. 7. The variance is not based on economic considerations alone. For all of the above reasons, factors other than solely economic factors, justify the grant of the requested variances. BE IT FURTHER RESOLVED by The City Council of the City of Lino Lakes hereby approves the following lot area variances for Poehling Addition: • Lot 1: o A 2,402 sf variance to reduce the lot area from 20,000 sf to 17,598 sf. • Lot 2: o A 3,575 sf variance to reduce the lot area from 20,000 sf to 16,425 sf. Adopted by the Council of the City of Lino Lakes this 12th day of November, 2019. The motion for the adoption of the foregoing resolution was introduced by Council Member_______________ and was duly seconded by Council Member ________________ and upon vote being taken thereon, the following voted in favor thereof: The following voted against same: