My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Search
11-12-2019 Council Packet
LinoLakes
>
City Council
>
City Council Meeting Packets
>
1982-2020
>
2019
>
11-12-2019 Council Packet
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
10/30/2021 1:08:48 PM
Creation date
1/16/2020 10:21:55 AM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
City Council
Council Document Type
Council Packet
Meeting Date
11/12/2019
Council Meeting Type
Regular
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
126
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
View images
View plain text
<br />2 <br /> <br />protect public waters. Per the ordinance Policy statement, the uncontrolled use of <br />shorelands of the City affects the public health, safety and general welfare not only by <br />contributing to pollution of public waters, but also by impairing the local tax base. <br /> <br />The required public street setback along West Shadow Lake Drive is 30 feet. <br /> <br />Lot 1: The current street setback for the existing house is 22.2 feet. The house was <br />constructed in 1984 and surveys were not required and setbacks may not have been <br />verified. <br /> <br />Lot 2: The proposed street setback for the future house is 25 feet. Reducing the front <br />setback allows more separation from the building pad to the existing wetland and public <br />water thus protecting the public water. There will also be less floodplain impact and <br />impervious surface. <br /> <br />2. The variance shall be consistent with the comprehensive plan. <br /> <br />The variance request for both Lot 1 and Lot 1 is consistent with the comprehensive plan. <br />The subject site is guided for low density residential development and the proposed two <br />(2) lot residential development is consistent in regards to land use and density. <br /> <br />3. There shall be practical difficulties in complying with the ordinance. “Practical <br />difficulties,” as used in connection with the granting of a variance, means that the <br />property owner proposes to use the property in a reasonable manner not permitted by the <br />ordinance. Economic considerations alone do not constitute practical difficulties. <br />Practical difficulties include, but are not limited to, inadequate access to direct sunlight <br />for solar energy systems. <br /> <br />Lot 1: There are practical difficulties in meeting the 30 foot street setback. The property <br />owner proposes to use the property in a reasonable manner with an existing single family <br />house. The existing house was built in 1984 and there is no proposed change in use. <br />There would be considerable economic burden to require the property owner to move the <br />house in order to comply with the setback requirements. <br /> <br />Lot 2: There are practical difficulties in meeting the 30 foot street setback due to existing <br />floodplain and wetlands located on site. The property owner proposes to use the property <br />in a reasonable manner by constructing a single family house. <br /> <br />4. The plight of the landowner shall be due to circumstances unique to the property not <br />created by the landowner. <br /> <br />The plight of the landowner is due to circumstances unique to the property and was not <br />created by the landowner. <br /> <br />Lot 1: The house was constructed in 1984 and surveys were not required and setbacks <br />may not have been verified. <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.