My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Search
2020-010 Council Resolution
LinoLakes
>
City Council
>
City Council Resolutions
>
2020
>
2020-010 Council Resolution
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
2/21/2021 4:06:21 PM
Creation date
2/28/2020 2:41:44 PM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
City Council
Council Document Type
Resolutions
Meeting Date
02/10/2020
Council Meeting Type
Regular
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
4
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
View images
View plain text
CITY OF LINO LAKES <br />RESOLUTION NO. 20-10 <br />APPOINTING ELECTION JUDGES FOR THE MARCH 3, 2020 ELECTION <br />WHEREAS, a Presidential Nomination Primary (PNP) election will be held on March 3, 2020; <br />and <br />WHEREAS, pursuant to Minnesota Statutes, Section 204B.20, election judges shall be <br />appointed to serve in an election precinct and the appointing authority shall designate a judge to <br />serve as the head election judge; and <br />WHEREAS, training sessions for election judges in Lino Lakes are provided through an on- <br />line program; and <br />WHEREAS, Minnesota Statutes, Section 204B.21. Subd. 2. requires appointments be made <br />before the election at which the election judges will serve; <br />NOW, THEREFORE BE IT RESOLVED by The City Council of The City of Lino Lakes <br />that the attached list of certified eligible voters are hereby appointed to serve as election judges <br />and head judges for the 2020 Presidential Nomination Primary Election if called to do so. <br />Adopted by the Council of the City of Lino Lakes this loth day of February, 2020. <br />The motion for the adoption of the foregoing resolution was introduced by Council Member <br />Stoesz _and was duly seconded by Council Member Ruhland and upon <br />vote being taken thereon, the following voted in favor thereof: <br />Stoesz, Ruhland, Lyden, Rafferty <br />The following voted against same: <br />none <br />Rob <br />ATTEST: <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.