My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Search
2020-017 Council Resolution
LinoLakes
>
City Council
>
City Council Resolutions
>
2020
>
2020-017 Council Resolution
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
2/20/2021 1:39:53 PM
Creation date
2/28/2020 2:45:07 PM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
City Council
Council Document Type
Resolutions
Meeting Date
02/24/2020
Council Meeting Type
Regular
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
Page 1 of 1
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
View images
View plain text
CITY OF LINO LAKES <br />RESOLUTION NO. 20-17 <br />APPROVING SPRINT SPECTRUM L.P. LEASE <br />AGREEMENT — WATER TOWER #2 <br />WHEREAS, the existing lease agreement with Sprint Spectrum L.P. to operate <br />telecommunications equipment on the water tower located at 7001 Otter Lake Road has <br />expired; and <br />WHEREAS, City staff and the City Attorney have negotiated the proposed lease <br />agreement with Sprint Spectrum; and <br />WHEREAS, the term of the agreement is for five (5) years and will be automatically <br />renewed for three (3) additional five-year terms unless the Tenant provides Owner with <br />notice of its intention not to renew prior to the expiration of the Initial Term or any <br />Additional Term; and <br />WHEREAS, the rent has been increased to a monthly fee of $2,900.00. The monthly rent <br />payment will increase by 4% each year of this Agreement on each anniversary of July 26 <br />thereafter. <br />NOW, THEREFORE BE IT RESOLVED that the City Council of the City of Lino <br />Lakes hereby approves the Water Tower Lease Agreement with Sprint Spectrum L.P. for <br />Water Tower #2. <br />Adopted by the Council of the City of Lino Lakes this 24th day of February, 2020. <br />The motion for the adoption of the foregoing resolution was introduced by Council <br />Member <br />Stoesz and was duly seconded by Council Member Lyden and <br />upon vote beingtaken thereon, the followin voted in favor thereof: <br />Stoesz, den, Ruhland, Rafferty, <br />The following voted against same: <br />none <br />ATTEST: <br />hli <br />Ju e Bartell, CitCler <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.