Laserfiche WebLink
COUNCIL MINUTES <br />APPROVED <br />163 - Location and history review; <br />164 - Building requirements that are met; will be a substantial depature from current look; <br />165 - Elevations of proposed improvements and improvement details; <br />166 - Parking calculations and requirements; <br />167 - Planning and Zoning Board review and recommendations that are reflected in the council <br />168 resolution; <br />169 - No comments received at the Board public hearing. <br />170 Councilmember Stoesz moved to approve the 1st Reading of Ordinance No. 03-20 as presented. <br />171 Councilmember Lyden seconded the motion. Motion carried: Yeas, 5; Nays none. <br />172 Councilmember Stoesz moved to approve Resolution No. 20-26 as presented. Councilmember <br />173 Ruhland seconded the motion. Motion carried: Yeas, 5; Nays none. <br />174 6B) Consider Resolution No. 20-28, Supporting Federal Funding for I-35E and County Road <br />175 J Interchange and the Centerville Road and County Road J Intersection Project — Community <br />176 Development Director Grochala reviewed his written report and explained the history of improvement <br />177 consideration for this intersection. Staff is recommending that a grant request be submitted again in <br />178 an multi jurisdicational effort led by Ramsey County. Staff is requesting that the council support the <br />179 application. <br />181) Mayor Rafferty asked if a roundabout is planned and Mr. Grochala said options are being considered. <br />181 Councilmember Ruhland asked about the current condition of the bridge in the area. Mr. Grochala <br />182 suggested that the bridge was constructed in about 1967 and while it is structurally sound, it cannot be <br />183 widened including for additional facilities; plans would include replacement to allow for the addition <br />184 of pedestrian and bicycle use. Councilmember Rubland asked about plans to straighten out the "s" <br />185 curve and Mr. Grochala said that improvement is a consideration but would be a separate project. <br />186 Councilmember Lyden asked if there could be some improvements phased earlier rather than waiting <br />187 for the entire project to move. Mr. Grochala suggested that if funded this would be a 2024 project; <br />188 there is the possibilty of that intersection being a separate project coming forward. <br />189 Councilmember Stoesz asked if the project would be reliant on road fees for funding. Mr. Grochala <br />190 explained that those fees are not approved for use and they have been legally challenged in the past. <br />191 Mayor Rafferty remarked that this project is long overdue; with the 35E ramp nearby, traffic levels get <br />192 dangerously high. He clarified with staff the City boundary in the area. <br />193 Councilmember Ruhland moved to approve Resolution No. 20-28 as presented. Councilmember <br />194 Stoesz the motion. Motion carried: Yeas, 5; Nays none. <br />195 6C) Consider Resolution No. 20-27, Approve Construction Services Contract, East Cedar St <br />196 & 24th Avenue/Elmcrest Avenue N Improvement Project —Community Development Director <br />197 Grochala noted that staff has worked with WSB & Associates to reduce the contract as noted in the <br />198 report. The cost would be broken up between the two communites. <br />199 Mayor Rafferty asked about the change in direction and Mr. Grochala explained that some elements <br />200 are being broken out to allow those opportunities to other companies. <br />201 Councilmember Cavegn asked if the City of Hugo has approved the contract and staff said they have. <br />5 <br />